Search results

Ok, I thought it would be more like a cool archetype and nothing more but seeing that it can 50-50 a buzzwole deck I believe it will actually be on of the best decks right now. By the way I have a non-related question with this thread but if you could answer it I would be very grateful. Are WCD...

I understand everything you said and I find it really logical. I thought that with the lycanroc you could decide better which of your opponent's pokemons kill, but if it makes the deck not consistent enough I find obvious that having another garchomp evolution line is better.

Will this deck be in the meta or is just a cool and new deck that against buzzwoles and zoroarks loses all the time? I'd like to build it but I'm not 100% sure if it'll be worth it. I play with it in the tcg online but I'd love to have a real life deck.

Then I get it, and would the 2nd BW Necrozma be necessary or no?

So the third one would be just in case that one of your malamars is a prize card or if your opponent's active pokemon is very tough to kill, right?

But isn't having 3 malamar in your bench too much? I thought that the best lineup was ultra necrozma as an active pokemon, another ultra necrozma in bench, one oranguru in bench, 2 malamar in bench and a BW necrozma in bench. I'll try having a 3-3 line either way, thanks!

Hi there! I agree in almost all those cards but I would make some changes. First of all I would only play 2 inkay and 2 malamar as 4 is too much. Then I'd play 3 ultra necrozma, 2 mew, 1 or two oranguru and 2 BW Necrozma. I've played a lot with this deck and I think it's the best option.

Hi everyone. I'm new in this forum! I've been thinking a lot in a fighting garchomp deck and I agree in almost all of the cards that appear in your list but, since I don't have any tapu lele, I decided to build a deck a bit different from the usual. First of all I decided to put only 3...