Search results

Okay, I've just done a backread and am pretty convinced that Vom is scum. It's a long post and I do not expect Vom to respond to the content itself. I'm not even sure if Vom can defend themself against most of these points, as they are based largely on actions (points 1 and 2) or theoretical...

I can't remember if it's been raised but this quote is early Day 1 and is being directed at Mega. i.e. Scattered starts putting suspicion on Mega early in the game, which is odd to do if a scumbuddy.

This Fiery quote is a little suss, it looks coached. New town don't usually talk about "panic-voting", that's a more advanced term. New town would say "I panicked and voted for him". Does anyone know if Fiery has experience playing games where "panic-voting" is a thing?

I really like scattered's Day 1 thought progression - it is clear and logical (and a lot clearer than mine from day 2 rip). Anyway, I'd summarise the case on scattered like this: Points: - scattered has been cagey / hasn't explained his reads. - Defends the lurker-Cel wagon, but then votes for...

@scattered mind Will read in a sec, but can you cast a vote please?

Ah yes, thanks Vom for reminding me to reread the thread >.>' Yeah... this was the explanation I had in mind as well. Scattered quoting his old reads as if to suggest that's why he's obviously voting Amici is strange.

In that case, wouldn't the fact that Mega flipped scum and there being prior discussion about Amici=scum in Day 3 be enough progression to explain scattered's comment? (that "obviously my vote goes to Amici") Voting someone isn't going to get them eliminated, but it is going to make it harder...

Jabber's backread ISO is very very good. Eph points are great, scattered picks are even better. I find these the most persuasive: Aside - I'm going to reassess my Vom vote as I'm pretty sure there's a few progressions that Vom + others have pointed out that don't make sense if this was a...

@Jabberwock In general I think you've been very diplomatic, but I'm specifically referring to #547 in how you deal with scattered. Scattered (your top scumread) seemed to misunderstand you or even avoid addressing the crux of your case - which I think has happened multiple times today already...

This is a good point. I think my analysis has changed again since I've tried to look broadly at the context of Eph's posts. It's probably futile, but I'm trying to not focus in on anything. Sure, but do you have any scumtells on Jabber? Because I don't have many and it's hard to be confident in...

So here's a weird observation: Jabber is being very diplomatic in his solving and is doing a very good job at not causing fights. It's the dumbest scumtell ever - but scum desperately don't want to cause fights in this day phase because it is guaranteed to get them votes, while town technically...

Just popping in to quickly ask... I think the issue is that you didn’t continue to question or put pressure on Amici. For example, when I found Eph scummy but decided to stop tunneling them, I still continued to ask questions and put some pressure on them. It sounds like you’re saying you...

Vom is looking much better than. (Why wait to bus?) I’m not quite understanding - are you saying Vom made the bbn wagon invalid, but could easily turn it valid again? Cause I’m not following in that case.

@scattered About those weird things you pointed out about Vom and Mega, do you think they indicate Vom as townie or scumbuddy? Re: Eph, I do think Eph’s case on me is emotional - the issue is that they think they were solving on Day 4 but I think they had not been solving on Day 4 until their...

Oh whelp, here’s a post where Vom agreed with Eph. Was this before or after Mega’s response?

@scattered Do you think there are any flaws in my Eph analysis? This is definitely the shakiest part of the scenario. It depends on whether the options were actually valid. Mega’s defence was not very good, and so Vom could have gotten a lack of flack for hopping on to the bbn wagon instead of...

I'll answer both questions while I'm commuting in a bit - but what's the context of that post again?