Search results

And technicly it's still truth. Dead townie on day 1 would mean rolewise that it is beneficial for me. Does not mean I'm gonna vote town cause of my role tho.

Technicly there is a lot of town roles wich benefot from dead townies tho. Like all dead-interaction roles.

If you reread everything you would notice that I did not start the whole 3rd party thing, lel

Mechanical wise - in small setups there are roles wich are added to keep balance in smaller (so more swingy setups). You are not lynching a role wich is there to balance the whole game at the very day 1, lol.

Actualy you are way to fast to judge since my very first post, wich only makes this even funnier. But I'm not gonna point out your mistakes at the very day 1, lel.

##unvote ##vote: jplap As I said, I can easily prove myself as non-scum and as what role I am. And also, you are way too fast to jump and judge, wich is funny cause I'm pretty sure scum just hopped there on easy lynch. They don't need provable roles around after all.

3rd party role? Around 86 times. This is 87th time.

Actuuuuuuualy It was read only. Ehm...

Lel, wich scum would openly say in thread they wouldn't mind town being lynched xD

Nah, that is read only. I don't have any mechanical way of finding who is mafia. /shrug.

My reason is that MAriano is actualy scum. To be completly honest, I don't care who dies today. Town dying would be even more beneficial for me. But I'm not gonna vote town cause of that. Hence I am voting actual scum. /shrug

Solved? It will be solved when he will be lynched. :')

##VOTE: Mariano11887 You must wait 19 seconds before posting another message

##VOTE: Mariano11887 For reasons. I may or may not explain reasons later on.

Fake claims would be optional if not the "quote role pm" meta. Or if the example rolecard helped creating one. But if you check sample rolecard, it was useless in trying to understand how town role pm looks like. If you want to use quote meta, scum needs to have tools to work around it...

The most indicative was actualy scum not having any fakeclaims and not even knowing the town wincon. Scum could NOT pull such a strat at all cause of that. But that's something town couldn't have known. But really, look at Nick and tell me he is a type of player wich would fake over 20 messages...

Cause players were analysing it, cause "host's style is specific". It was basicly analysing out of game content to determine if someone is scum.

Neutral wich died could steal points. I'm 99% certain it was them, looking that the amount stolen matches.

I'm throwing away Nick and NP from PoE for now. NP for actualy townie actions, Nick for... pasting whole convo with pure stupid mistake about not noticing it was succesful visit, not heal. They don't seem like a player to fake it. (Tho I feel terribly bad for angleshooting, this site allows it...

This are TE's reads. Tbh NP is right about "Calling out names without doing anything about it". It seems like heavy antispew mode with a bit of position setup for next day. I mean, they literaly just call "neutral", "town", without any analysis, except for me and BB. And when I read mine it...