Search results

Oh yes they are. Best so far I agree. the heart and soul symbols from HGSS look like amateur-logo-design in comparison xD Sleek, minimalistic/perfectionist and geometrically correct, that's my style :E Another thing about the presentation: I liked that they did cover the whole franchise in the...

Welp, Sun and Moon confirmed. Saw that one coming xD aka "Actual info to come". At least it's hard for anyone to argue that it's not generation7 now. Just need a proper showcase of a connection to Zygarde or Kalos in general now, to confuse everyone even further ;) I'm sticking to "it's a...

Love the logos designs! They pretty much confirm generation 7, as expected. Now if only they would also somehow show a relation to the "Z-hype" to confirm that they're at the same time still tying up the plot from XY and Zygarde, eh? Well, they do, indirectly. The actual logos just so happen...

The question was what GFs definition of a new generation would be. They look at it more simple. Calling it 6.5 just raises questions that are unnecessary. I mean, otherwise I'd agree to the reasoning of calling it 6.5...but then again, I realize, how can I really call 151-251 gen 2 instead of...

So, before the Pokemon Direct on Friday airs, my (hopefully FINAL) summary/stance in terms of speculation/prediction about the next main-game-entry is this: -XY-sequel that is simultaneously deemed the 7th generation, -being to XY what BW2 was to BW (still 3DS and same engine, directly continued...

Random silly theory I have about the actual game titles: Pokemon B and Pokemon C. The logic being as follows: -gen6 had X&Y mascots -there is a third Z-legendary -XYZ are the final 3 letters of the alphabet -RS-remakes are filler-nostalgia-milking between XY and their "conclusion" -the remakes...

Yeah, but ask yourself "would they call that gen6 part2?". I mean, the definition of a new generation is as simple as "a bunch of new pokemon", and even if this would be just the second half to the pokemon we got in XY, there is no reason not to simply call it gen7.

LOL I read the initial sentences and thought "what the heck? There is no way WPM is joining in on this rumour-nonsense-train..", then I looked at the first few points and realized what it is. Well played.

This person here has summed it up so well that I'll stop explaining it myself for now xD: http://frozen-echo.deviantart.com/journal/Generation-VII-591645391

Oh gee, The GO-press presentation timeline-picture again: --this picture was made specifically for the press-conference-presentation for a specific context ("look how far the franchise got") and nothing else, so seeing anything more than that in it is not intended and is missing the point of it...

Even if they're all 1x catchrate and nothing else, I'd still kill for a handful of new Pokeballs to be available.... Apparently it doesn't mean anything to most of you ;P but half the time I'm breeding something in the games is only necessary because I always insist on passing a visually or...

I would actually prefer it if generation 7 implemented in this unique way, would also be unique in NOT adding new starters, because I feel like "one very appealing set of 3-stage designs that had more thought invested into them than 90% of the other pokemon" is already ufnair towards the other...

You're missing the part that the "ears" ARE the missing lower plates of the Pokeball shape. LOL dito. Well...I did explain to people that the GIA part is supposed to be gear (because people were jumping to magic at first for some reason), so I guess I did it indirectly xD

So #1=not enough time, #2=pacing/level curve, #3=gen7 taking spotlight from Zygarde. #1 Considering that, -it took them only a year from XY to ORAS -we're looking at 2 years between ORAS and the next plausible release -I'm assuming gen7 would not "reinvent the wheel", but simply continue using...

I've come to the conclusion that I've limited myself to thinking based on generation 5 too much in regards to generation 6 speculation (in that Z-themed games would end generation 6 before we move on). So let's take a few steps back. The first Pokémon sequels we've seen, were Gold & Silver...

So, my avatar proves that any Pokemon can be described with a sentence involving fusion of two other Pokemon? Wait, that makes no sense. (Also no idea what you thought my avatar is supposed to be, but it's Roosteel, my fake Skarmory pre-evolution, if that changes anything.)

Do you realize that there is a lot, and I mean A LOT, of Pokemon you could say "it's like a fanmade combination of this and that pokemon"?

Just like Mesprit/Uxie/Azelf were totally going to be retconned into Psychic/Fairy types, right? ;) I think slapping Fairy onto any cutesy legendary right away is a bit hasty. It might very well turn out to really be part Fairy, but a pure Steel type event-mon would be refreshing as F...

well hopefully. With generations that have below 100 pokemon then becoming a common thing, a new set of starters would finally be oversaturation of the concept... I don't want 1/6 of every new generation to be starters lol. (unless it would be different main types for every other turn)

A new Pokémon! :D It's interesting to say the least. The first bits about its backstory as well (supposedly built by humans 500 years ago, alrighttt). Design-wise, I immediately noticed that the "ears" fit exactly the missing bottom of the sphere. Which to me implies that this Pokemon can...