Search results

Yikes, three Town deaths last night...not the best thing to come back to from my birthday. Anyways, now that I’ve read up the basic gist of things, I’m confused as to how Blink suddenly drew their conclusion about me, considering the results they shared. At night, I can select a player, and all...

So...your suspicion of DFL didn’t have to do with your ability, then? Doesn’t that go against what you claimed earlier?

Well, admittedly both of those are “good behaviors” that scum can fake, but at least regarding the first point, knowing who the Watcher chooses to watch gives scum an idea of the Watcher’s strategy and they can potentially plan around them with more insight.

Sorry, I’m confused about this whole part, could you clarify some things? Surely you don’t mean your ability in this game, since you used it on Drac N1...unless you have another? And you’re saying DFL is acting different this game, yet they haven’t spoken in the thread at all since their joke...

Fair enough. If kiiruma ends up being Town, I could swing either way on morda’s alignment depending on future evidence; however, if kiiruma is the scum they appear to be, morda is more likely to be Town and will no longer be worth pursuing, hence my decision to see how the kiiruma lynch will...

My current reads list: Mordacazir - null; Drac’s one post doesn’t look good, but if kiiruma flips scum that could clear this slot. Let’s see how morda does. Blinkehyo - slight scum; we don’t want no lynches. Vom - slight town, their posts look like good attempts to analyze the game, even if I...

Ah, I missed that bit. /72 hr

Damn...that role would’ve been useful to have around. @Zone Q11 Any results? You must mean mordacazir, Draclord’s sub-in.

Hmm...for the most part, they look pretty neutral, but that scum read on DFL does raise flags. It seems rather fabricated to suggest someone who hasn’t posted since their joke vote. Then again, maybe DFL’s disappearance after RVS is exactly why Kiiruma suspects them? Your suspicion holds water...

Also, I don’t recall how it’s usually done here, but on my home site, vote ties usually result in no lynch.

Well, I’ve given things some thought...Zone’s behavior still seems pretty misaligned for Town, such as this quote right here: Still, it would be a big risk to fake Watcher, and if it’s true, we could keep Zone around, but I’d like tangible results and less tunneling without reason. ##UNVOTE...

So, pressuring someone for any reason you’ve observed is less towny than tunneling someone for no reason, according to you. Not really a dilemma. It’s just playing the game. I see you’re starting to notice the problem with your own prior assertions.

Do you have a reason for that vote, tigger?

And would “kicking a sleeping dog” be, say, pressuring a player for something they’ve said or done? Or more like tunneling on a player for reasons not relevant to the game since before they even posted? So OMGUS then. Uh, what? Just...what is this even supposed to mean?

Could you please clarify this distinction?

I don’t get this tbh. You leave your vote on him and point out a possible motive on Zone’s part to stall actual reasoning on his vote target, yet claim to have a neutral opinion on Zone?

Thank you for simplifying what I suspected of you. No, it does not look like you care. At best, you’ve rolled Town but are putting your own possibly destructive goal ahead of the win condition. At worst you’re actively trying to hurt the Town.

Hi NP, I’ve been in games on my home forum since my last one here, yeah, with varying degrees of success. Yeahhh, this mentality isn’t exactly helpful. With NP’s alignment unconfirmed, this could easily lead to a mislynch if not backed by evidence or actual reads. And this is about as much of...

Well, Zone did specifically state that his tunneling isn’t any kind of joke, despite lacking game-relevant reasoning. Maybe it does look like a reach to you, but I’m concerned about what Zone actually wants to accomplish here.