Search results

I see nothing that vaguely resembles an Eevee.

@Lotus- Yes this is possible. But has an official source EVER revealed the starter evo's before? Edit: Before release I mean. This just screams fishy.

All of these scans look real except for the starter one. Some awesome new pokes in there. Starter one's page doesn't match the style.

In b4ing all arguments about starters now. In the meantime, I look forward to the rest of that article being translated. Also agreeing with Gish.

Supposedly these Monkeys are supposed to evolve anyway. I don't know how legit this sounds though but we'll see.

Something to prove the starters aren't real please lol.

I hear that it was just the preview for the next one coming out actually.

I hate the destruction of the Pokemon community it is putting us through. No one should have posted those "starter evos" causing the war with all the main fan-based news sites. It's getting completely out of hand.

Hey hey guys. Listen This is one of the things the guy with the text dump said. Not saying everything he said was true but. This was revealed a few hours after he said it. Just something to think about I suppose.

RE: Back To School!! O_o Hooray for not being in school. I HOPEFULLY start either spring or next fall.

These guys are pretty cool I suppose.

Wasn't everyone super up on that plant thing being real too? DIDN'T THE SAME THING HAPPEN? I wasn't around much but I think I've heard of it.

Though I do NOT like what has been revealed as far as these starters go, IF they are real I would probably rage for an hour and then go on with my life. Then I would slowly accept them and end up loving each and every one. So far there is only ONE POKEMON I truly hate the design of, and that was...

@OMGxShante Makes you think huh? xD Anyone can do this.

@CRASHiC You already proved it fake here. Good job ruining your chance at that.

IT HAS BOARDERS IT MUST BE REAL GUYS GUYS?

It still says that Shellos is the pre-evolved form of Lapras in the site archives. 26-9-2006 iirc. Hilarious read.

@Mew But why would they shop the starters onto a backround? Even if there were other things on the page with it, the coverups in place would well, cover those up. These images are really fishy to me now :/

Give me the reasons why that would be done. I want to know. @Zaykorz - They colors in the test ARE different. That image is more than likely edited.

That link shows That that is an edited image. The two forms of the starters were made on some program, saved as a JPEG over and over to lower the quality, and then pasted onto that backround. That is what that link says.