What do you think about it?
I think movies should work on their own merit, and whether they complement the original source is almost irrelevant. For example, the Wizard of Oz movie is necessarily a very different work than the book on which it is based. It doesn't simply try to recreate Baum's story on film. The movie exists as a separate work of art, which is as it should be. I'm sure there are exceptions to this rule, movies that successfully mirror the written source, although I can't think of any offhand. Obviously, some books lend themselves to film better than others.
I think movies should work on their own merit, and whether they complement the original source is almost irrelevant. For example, the Wizard of Oz movie is necessarily a very different work than the book on which it is based. It doesn't simply try to recreate Baum's story on film. The movie exists as a separate work of art, which is as it should be. I'm sure there are exceptions to this rule, movies that successfully mirror the written source, although I can't think of any offhand. Obviously, some books lend themselves to film better than others.