Isn't that a typo, shouldn't it be cyrus' conspiracy? my friend found it, and i agreed, there should be no s after the apostrify.
Wiseman. said:No, it should NOT be Cyrus' conspiracy.
The apostrophe is used to show posession, and you use an 's on anything that is singular, and last time I checked, Cyrus is 1 guy. It would only be Cyrus' conspiracy if there were 2 Cyrus, and in this case there is 1 man.
EXAMPLES:
James. Ends with S. But is singular. SO: It is James's house.
James family. James ends with S. Is plural. SO: It is the James' house.
Get it?
Technically, either way is perfectly fine; you can say "James'" or "James's," and it will not break a rule.Wikipedia said:Basic rule (singular nouns)
For most singular nouns the ending 's is added; e.g., the cat's whiskers.
* If a singular noun ends with an /s/ or a /z/ sound (spelled with -s, -se, -z, -ce, for example), practice varies as to whether to add 's or the apostrophe alone. A widely accepted practice is to follow whichever spoken form is judged better: the boss's shoes, Mrs Jones' hat (or Mrs Jones's hat, if that spoken form is preferred). In many cases, both spoken and written forms differ between writers.
Alright you got your win, Wiseman. Happy?MLA said:• add 's to the singular form of the word (even if it ends in -s):
the owner's car
James's hat