The issue would be this: if we're down to three––a town, a coven, and a survivor––the survivor is under no obligation to lynch coven. Quaking's win is guaranteed, and he can decide who wins with him. He could literally flip a coin for who to lynch; it'll only a 50% chance of him voting with town to lynch coven, and a 50% chance of him voting with coven to lynch town. Does that make sense? Idk if I can explain it any better. :/And what's the problem with the Survivor accomplishing its goal? He wins if the game ends and he stays alive, and the game won't end until the Town, the Coven or the Jugger achieve their objective. In that case, there will be 2 winning factions (Surv and one of the other 3).
>.>A poisoned player would turn up dead at the beginning of the next day, unless they're cured. They would have the following day and night to live, after they've been poisoned.
<.<
I swear that's not how poison usually works.
P(A ∩ B) = P(A) P(B|A). Assuming independence, it's just pure multiplication.[/QUOTE
I mean sure, w/e; the point's moot anyway. I don't feel qualified to argue this. :x
Why? You were convinced at the beginning of the day that he was juggernaut or coven at the very least.That last comment was talking to Drac, btw. I completely doubt scattered is anything but town.
Yeah, noted. >.>And btw, Jabber, your plan 100% doesn't work via what Lorde just said.
##VOTE: GM DRACLORD
@quakingpunch73 @scattered mind where'd you go? It's one thing to disappear during D1, but this point in the game is kinda important. :U