Making a Semi-Competitive Deck from Theme Decks

Hippydude

Aspiring Trainer
Member
I've recently come back to the game myself (havent played since legendary collection release in 2002) and just purchased two theme decks from breakthrough. I'm trying to to get back into competitive play but first i figure league play might be a good way to practice and learn about the current metagame. My question is it worth it really to try to build off of these two decks into something decently competitive? Im currently favoring the burning spark deck (fire and electic) atm.
 
Not really. Not only do the theme decks (from any set, not just this pair) lack a huge number of the staples of any halfway competitive decklist (both in terms of Pokemon and Trainers), but there's often no effort at all to promote synergy between Pokemon in them, and most of the mons that are included are generally not high-quality ones.

That being said, if we look at this pair of decks specifically, we do have a couple of mons that could be useful in a radically different build. In Night Striker, we've got the new Zoroark, which is a useful tech in all sorts of decks, and Gengar, which synergizes nicely with Gengar-EX PHF and bats in a deck specifically tailored around the Creep Show attack. From Burning Spark, Magnezone could be useful in decks built around the new Raikou, and Smeargle could be a useful tech for Tyrantrum-EX decks. That's about all we got, though.
 
Ive done some research myself about atleast burning spark and dwarf is correct with magnezone. It really reminds me of the old rain dance archtype from back in base set. I feel the raichu is decent as well with potential turn 2 110 dmg. I realize the trainers in these intro decks are definately sub par, but that can be corrected for the most part for less than $10 by using the list of staple trainers on the forums here.

For the most part i probably should have specified that i was more worried about the pokemon from a given theme deck rather than the trainers.

Right now im running something similar to burning spark on tcgo with magnezone, raichu, and stunfisk that is doing good atleast in lower tier versus.

The whole idea of EX and megas is still something im getting familiar with. Im still gauging the power of them vs regular pokemon and how to deal with them.
 
Well, in terms of power compared to regular Pokemon, the EX cards are a straight upgrade in most cases (even the mediocre EX mons are a little easier to set up and do damage with than non-EX ones, on average). There are comparatively few non-EX attackers that really work well in a fast format like this one, although the numbers of those have been increasing. If you want to build a deck that doesn't rely on EX mons as your primary attackers (those things do get pretty expensive), Night March decks and ones based around Vespiquen AOR (the regular one, not the one with the Ancient Trait) are probably your best bet. I haven't kept up on prices for specific cards because I only play on TCGO (broke college student, wooooo), but I do know most of the things in those decks are fairly inexpensive, with the exception of Shaymin-EX (necessary in pretty much any competitive deck for draw power, and stupidly high-priced). I will note that Night March is better in Expanded than in Standard, though. You can find skeleton lists for both in the Metagame Deck Discussion section and tweak them to suit your needs.

Regarding mons from Burning Spark, Raichu is OK-ish, but it doesn't have the raw power needed to stand up to most modern decks. If you want to use Raichu, better to go for the one from the XY base set and build a deck around that. Stunfisk is in a similar situation, except I don't think there's ever been a competitively viable Stunfisk card. If you're aiming to put this deck together for more casual competitions, then it's a little easier to make a deck from mons taken out of theme decks, but if you're doing this for serious competitive play, the pickings are pretty slim.
 
Back
Top