• When creating a thread in the Deck Garage, make sure that you post one deck per thread, you use the correct prefix, you have the set name/card number next to each card, you give a strategy for non-metagame decks, and give translations for all cards not available in English.

    When posting in a thread, be sure to explain all your suggestions thoroughly. Additionally, do not ask for advice in another member's thread.

Modified Grass Deck (Tangrowth, Virizion, Lilligant)

Cheshire

Cheshire

The Disney Master
Member
I want to see what other people think or if I should change anything. Here's what I got:
-A counter to fire decks. Reshiram/Typhlosion is the most popular deck right now, and it'll tear apart ANY grass deck, so I needed some counter. Samurott BW takes care of that, as its attack only requires colorless so I can use a DCE and a grass to power it up
-4 Pokémon Collector. Without getting basics my deck is just dead in the water
-I have at least 2 catchers and at least 3 junk arms, among other things. Rare Candies will allow for faster setup, so they're a necessity.
-Thicker lines of better Pokémon. Tangrowth, it can be competitive, especially combined with Lilligant EP and Fliptini. Virizion is a very competitive Grass starter.

So, this is what I have, to start:

Pokémon
+2-1-2 Samurott Ability BW
+3-3 Lilligant EP
+2-2 Tangrowth CL
+2 Victini NV 14 (Fliptini)
+3 Virizion NV
+1 Cleffa HGSS
~21

T/S/S
+2 Juniper
+2 PONT
+3 Cheren
+4 Collector
+4 Communication
+3 Catcher
+3 Junk Arm
+2 Rare Candy
+2 Twins
~25

Energy
+11 Grass
+3 Double Colorless
~14

Since 2 of my Pokémon can paralyze, I simplified the deck to make it so that can happen much more consistently. Serperior was unnecessary and clunky, as it may have healed between turns but all of my Pokémon are OHKO-able anyways. Samurott will help much more in my bad matchups and is just an overall good attacker (when my opponent has a fire or fighting deck, that is).

Please feel free to give any opinions. I'm still not sure if I should keep the Samurott set in but not sure what would be good to replace it.
 
^ Please, drop the shortened words. It's just annoying. As for the deck, only 1-0-1 Sammurot is needed, if any. Tyram isn't too popular, so no worries there. Also, have you considered vileplume and sunflora? They would increase the deck's consistensy and make it harder for the opponent to break the lock.
 
I don't think that there should be cherens because Sage's, PONT, and juniper are better drawing power. Sage's is definitely needed to draw cards and get out the cards needed as quickly as possible. I'd either replace a couple of cheren with 1-2 Sage's or PONT or Juniper.
 
Jirachi said:
I don't think that there should be cherens because Sage's, PONT, and juniper are better drawing power. Sage's is definitely needed to draw cards and get out the cards needed as quickly as possible. I'd either replace a couple of cheren with 1-2 Sage's or PONT or Juniper.
Click to expand...

Thanks I will try putting some Sage's in and see if that works. :)

This deck seems to be very energy driven but there is no energy engine?
Click to expand...

What do you mean by that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top