porygon-z x and moms kidness???

MANAPHY=)

MANAPHY=)

Aspiring Trainer
Member
Im just woundering is porygon-z that worth it to use its power for those two cards and the only way to get them is to use claydol felicitys and tvr and now the trainer card moms kindness i mean it seems worth it to use it but what happens if you cant draw those two cards in the turn you do its power and then your opp. uses wager or something to totally disrupt it and you lose those cards.so what im saying is porgon x is a downgrade of pigeots quick search and for people that really want to play it for its power why not stick with furret wich is quicker than porygon-z x,discuss and help me out a little bit.
also i want to know is moms kindness the worst trainer in the meta or not ,i mean why did they make this in the first place.discuss and i need to know if porygon-z is worht being in a deck.thanks.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

If you were previously running a porygon-z deck then I dont think it could really hurt to add it in, but by no means should someone add the whole line in just for the lv X.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

ya but i stopped trying to build porygon after two of my freinds got 9 tails in arow with porygon-z sooo.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

Why Moms Kidness any other Draw Card is much better ^^
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

^^Agreed.^^ Why not POV or TVR? Sure Mom's Kindness would be better if it were a trainer, but its a Bill all over again. If you ask me it is a total waste of a Supporter. It may work with this combo, it may not. But if you were to play it, I wouldn't play it as a dominate Supporter. I would play it as a Backup or Support(lol) Supporter. One or two would do.
 
POV, TVR, Felicity's, TGM and Claydol. Those are all better than Mom's Kindness.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

thats what im saying its just why did they make this card i mean i thought they learned after bill.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

They made it to keep it simple for little kids. Although I question how many kids can't put a card on the bottom of the deck/discard.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

Papi/Manny said:
They made it to keep it simple for little kids. Although I question how many kids can't put a card on the bottom of the deck/discard.
Click to expand...

exactly (the second part)

and for the first part, they should have made it 3 cards then...
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

ya but they didnt but if you just think what a waist of card is for that i meant it has the picture of potion it so they at least coudnt put on there draw 2 cards then remove 2 damge counters if any of your active pokemon but no.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

porygon lvx would be good play wager you lost your field claydol bench porygon z lvx active put any 2 cards on top of deck cosmic power 2 cards too bottom draw 5 cards
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

It would be better as a lockdown deck with omastar and beach. Problem is theres no real attacker in that sort of deck.
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

ya your right but it would be funny to see that deck win a few games
 
RE: porygon-z x and moms kidness??

Well, one could consider PorygonZ the attacker. Tho, why would you need Z LVX when unevolved pokes can't use Scramble/DRE anyway? Thats why Omastar would be enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top