Ruling question of wonder

[username]

if i use a deck with a main atker,2 secondary atkers,and a starter will it be successful?how about a deck with many 2-2-1 lines that is kikin butt

 

[Pokeric]

depends, but if you wanna speed it up and have more power go a 2-1-2 line instead with 2/3 candies

 

[username]

my old deck,help, has beaten many people,and it has 2-2-1 lines

 

[Papi/Manny]

I've seen a few decks with alot of 1-0-1 lines in them and they all had winning records. Doesn't mean much, but it could work. A 2-2-1 line doesn't sit with me though. Go with a 2-1-2 or a 1-1-1. And its depends on the cards and how well they fit together.

 

[username]

so a 1-1-1 line with swampert(CG) would work

 

[Papi/Manny]

Obviously a 2-1-2 line is far superior (and a 3-2-3 over that, ect., dending on how important it is to the deck). There are other cards with the other ones power for next format so that you don't have to use him if you only have 1 copy of him (would trade for more if you really want to play him though). But if youre using him for his power, you would only want a 1-1(or 0)-1 line of him because having an extra mudkip/marshtomp probly won't help you that much.

 

[username]

thanks

---

how bout a 1-2 line?

 

[Lieutenant Houndoom]

1 BAsic, 2 stage 1's? Just weird. Use equal amounts of Stage 1 and Basic.

 

[Papi/Manny]

Works well in a pre-release. Unless you're going for 1 specific pokemon as your starter and the other one would be unpreferable (such as houndour in bandoom), I would go with a 2-2 or a 1-1 line.

 

[Pokeric]

with swampert id say a 2-1-2 line hes most usefull for his ability but has a good attak as well

 

[username]

oh,good thought

 

[Pokeric]

or swampert + queen delta=