With ORAS out of the way, the main game series has now got into a weird situation in regards to remakes.
When the first remakes FRLG came out in 2004 (gen III), the original RG were 8 years old.
After that, the logic was simple: next up were the next most outdated games (GSC, resulting in HGSS and then RSE resulting in ORAS).
But now that we had remakes of gen III, the most outdated games are not DP... but FRLG, because they came out in the same generation as the games ORAS are remakes of. In fact, FRLG are now 11 years old. Meaning the original remakes are now 3 years older than the originals were when the remakes first came out!
What happens when the most outdated games are themselves already remakes of outdated games?
Do they deserve another remake too? Why? Why not?
I mean, every single reason for why ORAS was "necessary" (Fairy type, Megas, special/physical split, gameplay and region in new graphics, wi-fi etc..) can be just as well be extrapolated for why Re-remakes of Red/Green would be in that sense "necessary".
Or do DP deserve to be remade next simply because they haven't had the chance yet?
Even though DP are more up-to-date with the special/physical split for example, whereas FRLG didn't even have that yet?
Which begs the question... what is the point of remakes in the first place?
IMO it has always been mostly just a nostalgia-milking-cashcow (for FRLG a big reason was also to make tons of old Pokémon available, but that was only a legit case for FRLG.)
And if profit is the main and deciding factor... wouldn't re-remakes of RBGY likely sell more than DPt remakes, hence be the more likely candidate?
Let me add, that I personally never liked the idea of remakes themselves. I'd rather want new stuff, or if it is old stuff, at least with enough fresh twists added for it to be worth a revisit... which so far all remakes failed to achieve for me... I would argue that apart from the Sevii-islands, HGSS and ORAS did not even put in slightly more effort than just the very least that was necessary for the games to be "finished" (Don't get me wrong I still enjoy the heck out of them like any of us, it's just that they could be better in lots of ways)
In other words, I would prefer no remakes in the first place (at least make them sequels instead), but since they're a cashcow and everyone is going to buy them anyway, they're pretty much inevitable...
I'm mostly just curious to how fans react to this topic. I have posed this topic on other sites and was surprised at people actually wanting RBGY-re-remakes to come out.
Also, discuss what would be different in Re-remakes of RedGreen from FRLG.
What would they be called?
Perhaps focus on the other 2 colors of RGBY to avoid confusion with FRLG...by calling them WaterBlue and ThunderYellow this time instead? Or just some fancier words than Fire and Leaf?
Put the Starters Mega evolutions on the covers?
That could be a bit boring though since we already know them. Since Charizard already has 2 Megas, maybe give Venusaur/Blastoise second ones and put those on the covers (if they were exotic enough like MegaZardX, they could even represent different colors)?
What about the post-game? More Sevii adventures?
Or should these games be sequels rather than re-remakes in the first place?
I know GS were kind of sequels to RGBY, but they were that in the sense of continuing the franchise, rather than expanding Kanto.
Or perhaps make it a Kanto-sequel with Johto in the post-game to already avoid the need of revisiting Johto anytime soon?
An expanded Kantodex this time so we don't need the "hmm it stopped evolving for no reason"-nonsense?
If it was a sequel.. how many years after FRLG would the story be? OR how many years earlier? To witness Mewtwos creation? Or see Cinabar blow up? Or have Cinabar include an explorable volcano by now?
Some kind of new forms for the legendary birds, maybe?
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION OF WHAT GAME IS COMING NEXT (which is likely follow-up/closure/sequels for XY)
tl;dr:
Would you prefer revisiting Kanto before any other next remakes?
If there was a new Kanto game, would you prefer if it was a remake or a sequel?
When the first remakes FRLG came out in 2004 (gen III), the original RG were 8 years old.
After that, the logic was simple: next up were the next most outdated games (GSC, resulting in HGSS and then RSE resulting in ORAS).
But now that we had remakes of gen III, the most outdated games are not DP... but FRLG, because they came out in the same generation as the games ORAS are remakes of. In fact, FRLG are now 11 years old. Meaning the original remakes are now 3 years older than the originals were when the remakes first came out!
What happens when the most outdated games are themselves already remakes of outdated games?
Do they deserve another remake too? Why? Why not?
I mean, every single reason for why ORAS was "necessary" (Fairy type, Megas, special/physical split, gameplay and region in new graphics, wi-fi etc..) can be just as well be extrapolated for why Re-remakes of Red/Green would be in that sense "necessary".
Or do DP deserve to be remade next simply because they haven't had the chance yet?
Even though DP are more up-to-date with the special/physical split for example, whereas FRLG didn't even have that yet?
Which begs the question... what is the point of remakes in the first place?
IMO it has always been mostly just a nostalgia-milking-cashcow (for FRLG a big reason was also to make tons of old Pokémon available, but that was only a legit case for FRLG.)
And if profit is the main and deciding factor... wouldn't re-remakes of RBGY likely sell more than DPt remakes, hence be the more likely candidate?
Let me add, that I personally never liked the idea of remakes themselves. I'd rather want new stuff, or if it is old stuff, at least with enough fresh twists added for it to be worth a revisit... which so far all remakes failed to achieve for me... I would argue that apart from the Sevii-islands, HGSS and ORAS did not even put in slightly more effort than just the very least that was necessary for the games to be "finished" (Don't get me wrong I still enjoy the heck out of them like any of us, it's just that they could be better in lots of ways)
In other words, I would prefer no remakes in the first place (at least make them sequels instead), but since they're a cashcow and everyone is going to buy them anyway, they're pretty much inevitable...
I'm mostly just curious to how fans react to this topic. I have posed this topic on other sites and was surprised at people actually wanting RBGY-re-remakes to come out.
Also, discuss what would be different in Re-remakes of RedGreen from FRLG.
What would they be called?
Perhaps focus on the other 2 colors of RGBY to avoid confusion with FRLG...by calling them WaterBlue and ThunderYellow this time instead? Or just some fancier words than Fire and Leaf?
Put the Starters Mega evolutions on the covers?
That could be a bit boring though since we already know them. Since Charizard already has 2 Megas, maybe give Venusaur/Blastoise second ones and put those on the covers (if they were exotic enough like MegaZardX, they could even represent different colors)?
What about the post-game? More Sevii adventures?
Or should these games be sequels rather than re-remakes in the first place?
I know GS were kind of sequels to RGBY, but they were that in the sense of continuing the franchise, rather than expanding Kanto.
Or perhaps make it a Kanto-sequel with Johto in the post-game to already avoid the need of revisiting Johto anytime soon?
An expanded Kantodex this time so we don't need the "hmm it stopped evolving for no reason"-nonsense?
If it was a sequel.. how many years after FRLG would the story be? OR how many years earlier? To witness Mewtwos creation? Or see Cinabar blow up? Or have Cinabar include an explorable volcano by now?
Some kind of new forms for the legendary birds, maybe?
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION OF WHAT GAME IS COMING NEXT (which is likely follow-up/closure/sequels for XY)
tl;dr:
Would you prefer revisiting Kanto before any other next remakes?
If there was a new Kanto game, would you prefer if it was a remake or a sequel?