Seeker and Luxchomp?
- Thread starter Nigel
- Start date
No. its not good. Waste of your supporter, lets them pick up something and if your playing correctly you dont need more poketurns.
I am not telling seeker is worthless. But in a Luxchomp deck, no. First of all, the deck works very well. Four poke turn is more than enough. Imagine each bright look kills a pokemon (Spiritomb or other preparation pokemon). 2 Prize.
Dragon rush with let us say 2 poke turns: 3 prices. Aaron s collection takes out the dead SP Lv.X back and usually, there is at least 2.
Maybe you think that you can use it against Trainer Lock, Hello Dialga G. Plus, it waste you supporter in a turn. More, an Uxie back into the hands or your opponent.
Seeker seems good,but it can be very bad too. As for SPs (Cheapest pokemon cards in the world), poke turn is the best (it is like a old scoop up fused with new super scoop up, and just for SPs).
Dragon rush with let us say 2 poke turns: 3 prices. Aaron s collection takes out the dead SP Lv.X back and usually, there is at least 2.
Maybe you think that you can use it against Trainer Lock, Hello Dialga G. Plus, it waste you supporter in a turn. More, an Uxie back into the hands or your opponent.
Seeker seems good,but it can be very bad too. As for SPs (Cheapest pokemon cards in the world), poke turn is the best (it is like a old scoop up fused with new super scoop up, and just for SPs).
It works under trainer lock, but as the point of trainer lock is to hinder your turn drastically, and using your supporter for the turn is pretty hurtful. It's already a given that you need to kill the lock if you wanna go anywhere, and LuxChomp will do that. Hunter also saves your opponent's bench from the free prizes you're supposed to snag. Even for it's most useful aspect in Luxchomp, Hunter is a rather bad card, at least on paper.
~L_X_F
~L_X_F