J.D. said:
I'd rather have Palutena confirmation
Super Smash Bros. 3DS/Wii U
- Thread starter Rusty Sticks
- Start date
I'd rather have Palutena confirmation
I wouldn't have minded Ralph from the movie "Wreck-It Ralph" to make a Super Smash Bros. debut especially since his creation was inspired by the original Donkey Kong that we know today as Cranky Kong. Alex Kidd would've also been a nice addition to the Smash Bros. roster as well.
Blah said:Blech, I hate Diddy. He's annoying to play against (the bananas ;-
Oh don't be salty. I don't main Diddy but you have to admit - he adds a new dimension to play with his unique playstyle. I don't like going up against him either but he's actually kind of fun to troll with. Glad he's in the new SSB.
Just confirm Mewtwo.
And Dr. Mario.
Please.
Mewtwo yes... Dr. Mario? I wouldn't count on him... except maybe as a costume, and there's no guarantee that'll happen.Serperior said:
I fail to see how that makes sense... actually, I fail to see how this whole thing makes sense. What does that make Melee characters exactly? And what should they call characters returning from Brawl? This whole thing sounds very silly actually... it's just a word indicating experience, which characters from Brawl (and Melee) have... I don't see how that implies they've been around forever, or even why that matters...Blob55 said:
I don't think Dr. Mario will get in either...but hey. Wishful thinking.
I don't like using the word "veteran" because Smash games have been spread out over many years of play. Heck, Pichu, Roy, etc. are technically twelve years old. How could we consider them not veterans? I like using the term "original" because the twelve we started with are the "original" Smash Brothers and have recurred throughout the series.
I don't like using the word "veteran" because Smash games have been spread out over many years of play. Heck, Pichu, Roy, etc. are technically twelve years old. How could we consider them not veterans? I like using the term "original" because the twelve we started with are the "original" Smash Brothers and have recurred throughout the series.
Serperior said:I don't think Dr. Mario will get in either...but hey. Wishful thinking.
I don't like using the word "veteran" because Smash games have been spread out over many years of play. Heck, Pichu, Roy, etc. are technically twelve years old. How could we consider them not veterans? I like using the term "original" because the twelve we started with are the "original" Smash Brothers and have recurred throughout the series.
You've gone and made a teen feel old. Good for you.
I always call the characters, "Originals," "Returning," and, "New."
Speaking of new, I was organizing my games a few nights back and I noticed the back of Brawl's case talks about Snake and Sonic joining the Brawl. But then they lock the characters. What's up with that? =P
Watch they put in Dr. Luigi instead of Dr. Mario. I'd be so butthurt.
Sonic and Snake are 'guest' characters... we know they're in, but you still got to work for them because they don't belong to Nintendo.SotS said:Serperior said:I don't think Dr. Mario will get in either...but hey. Wishful thinking.
I don't like using the word "veteran" because Smash games have been spread out over many years of play. Heck, Pichu, Roy, etc. are technically twelve years old. How could we consider them not veterans? I like using the term "original" because the twelve we started with are the "original" Smash Brothers and have recurred throughout the series.
You've gone and made a teen feel old. Good for you.I kid, I kid.
I always call the characters, "Originals," "Returning," and, "New."
Speaking of new, I was organizing my games a few nights back and I noticed the back of Brawl's case talks about Snake and Sonic joining the Brawl. But then they lock the characters. What's up with that? =P
And what's the point of calling one set 'originals' and the rest 'returning'? ...all characters from previous Smash games are returning; just seems like a pointless glorification of the characters from the first Smash...
Oh god. Don't be like Genwunners. Technically, non-"New" characters are "Returning", no matter how you put it. You can call them "Original" for nostalgia's sake, but there's no real point in it.
J.D. said:
That's nice and all, but I wasn't trying to start a petty argument over wording. I just find it funny that two characters so big that they were on the back of the game's case along with a nice bit of text space required unlocking. It'd be like if the Generation 7 Pokemon games came out, and on the back said something like, "Choose any starter -- New or old!" but then you had to go through the whole game to unlock them.
As for how I choose to say things... Does it really matter? You seem to be getting yourself rustled up over nothing; you and Scorched Feathers both (ehehe, rustled up, feathers, get i- yeah okay). The point is that, as I said in my post, "I always call." Or in other words, it's just what I've always said. Perhaps I should have said I've instead of I just to show it's nothing more than how I've said it throughout the years.
Momaster12 said:
I'd laugh so hard. That'd be hilarious! Plus, Dr. Mario is one of my favorite Melee characters, so I wouldn't mind it.
Better than another Fox clone, I'd think.Interesting idea for the B projectile would be to be able to switch between normal and L-shaped pills. Each would have a different kind of bounce/trajectory, transforming the Dr. character from a clone to a more ranged type of character.
There's a key difference there, in that Third Party owned characters in a Nintendo owned Smash game aren't the same as Nintendo owned Pokemon in a Nintendo owned Pokemon game...SotS said:
Part of including Third Party characters is advertising their addition and letting people know about it, yet at the same as they are not Nintendo owned characters they are treated as 'bonus' characters and thus treated as a reward for players, and as a reward they must first be obtained.
No it doesn't matter what you say, and no I'm not getting rustled up... I'm just trying to understand your logic which, frankly, I find totally illogical. There's no real point in dividing up the original characters from the rest of the veterans... as Scorched Feathers said, it kind of sounds like Genwunner logic... not that it all matters; this started because Blob55 said he didn't like how they grouped Smash64 characters with later returning characters into the 'veteran' group, which is itself a totally irrelevant topic of debate, since A) it's the definition Sakurai uses and it's not about to change and B) all returning characters from previous Smash games classify as veterans of Smash Brothers.SotS said:
Also... Waluigi is an Assist Trophy again... weep Waluigi fans... everyone else celebrate!
Dedenne will appear in Super Smash Bros.!! My guess is that it will more than likely appear from a Pokéball.
Oh dear. If Fletchling doesn't appear, expect me on Sakurai's doorstep armed with a crowbar.
;w;
;w;
A new arena, exclusive to the 3DS version, will take place atop Lumious Cities Prism Tower!
If there's an arena that's based on a location from Pokémon X&Y, mega evolutions have to debut in Super Smash Bros. Wii U/3DS!! fingers crossed
If there's an arena that's based on a location from Pokémon X&Y, mega evolutions have to debut in Super Smash Bros. Wii U/3DS!! fingers crossed