Overall a good read but I've a more "technical" question for you,
@Kenneth Ecker :
Was organizing by "set" the best approach? At a glance it seems like the obvious choice, but kind of like how
N survived rotation via a promo last time, reprints abound for many cards. As you encountered in your own article, quite a few cards are interrelated, so I can see why just doing a straight up "Type" breakdown would have had issues as well, but a more... topical approach could have been interesting. Perhaps even as a series of articles.
Yeah since I'm perpetually behind on writing I'm probably not going to write such a thing, but at the very least you might do it again next year, and I'm curious as to your thoughts otherwise.