Btw if you don't know what it's used for it has [F][C][C] for 10+ and 50+ for each of your opponent's EX in play.
Not to nitpick, but in common shorthand it would be [RCC] or [R][C][C]. "F" usually stands for "Fighting", we don't use vowels (for whatever reason), so "Fire" got stuck using "R". Obviously though I get what you meant.
Having been more focused on Legacy Format, I hadn't noticed that Standard/Expanded were becoming
really Pokémon-EX heavy. I mean until recently I was mostly using decks like
Vespiquen and/or Night March, so I was used to having just one or two Pokémon-EX in play at a time. When I first saw the card, I mostly thought of the semi-recent decks that weren't so Pokémon-EX heavy (what I just said plus
Trevenant BREAK,
Greninja BREAK, and a few others). Yeah, that was a brain
fail on my part. As long as your opponent has at least two Pokémon-EX in play, you'll get a good 110 damage out of it, and most decks will have that many in play if they have a decent (or better) setup. For want of something better to play I've gone back to the well known Maxie's Yveltal deck for Expanded play, where I usually have more like three to five Pokémon-EX in play...
Salamance-EX gonna wreck me if it shows up. XD
yes I know first hand I didn't expect it and got destroyed but what about post SM with less and less EXs being good if any GX are good?
What
@Anthony Orosco is trying to get at is that
- Pokémon-EX are not Pokémon-GX (which you seem to know)
- But Pokémon-EX are still going to be a major part of the metagame.
So
Salamence-EX will have a few more match-ups where it isn't hitting quite as hard, there should be plenty of decks that will at worst run one less Pokémon-EX to make room for an additional Pokémon-GX, or not bother with the newer mechanic at all.