I'm starting to get particularly suspicious of AtA...
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
##VOTE: Lenny
His posts are too long and well thought out for Day 1. IIRC (which I probably don't RC) you played last game and barely posted
The first RVS. I'm not paying too much attention to it, although the view is certainly scummy. It looks like AtA 'forgot' people could use abilities the night before, and discouraging conversation is certainly a scummy thing.
this isn't RVS! i didn't "forget" anything. I was simply giving my opinion on why Lenny makes sense as a lynch candidate. If Camoclone did a game where he never RVS'd anyone I'm sure you'd call him out. Does that make you suspicious? No
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
Wtf how do you know this
Assumptions are real in this one. This is why I have not un-voted you yet
I'm pretty sure the vote on me was RVS, since he showed no reasoning to make it real, however he implies here it's real. Not to mention the fact he assumed I was making an assumption and basically was oblivious to the vote count.
this wasn't RVS! I didn't think to count up all the votes from all the vote counts to figure out everyone's vote weight. I was Legitamitely confused and thought you knew something the rest of the town did not.
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
I'm not experienced enough to see where all this is coming from and got a little confused
This excuse annoys me. Firstly AtA doesn't think the evidence against Drac is sound, and then blames it to the excuse of less experience. Hello? I believe I'm less experienced but I found this lead on Drac to make sound sense. And then AtA only put a vote on Drac after he OMGUS (below quote)! I do not see what makes that sound.
j didn't think it was sound because I didn't understand what he was getting at. Nothing more, nothing less. After someone explained a little bit and I re-read it. I could see where everyone is coming from. Also I don't understand why I can't call someone out for OMGUS?
AlexanderTheAwesomye said:
I was pretty unsure to lynch you as the QT reasoning didn't seem very sound, but this vote just throws me for a loop. It seems only for revenge and for that reason:
##UNVOTE: bbninjas
##VOTE: GM DracLord
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
I honestly think that grant might be the ministry guy... Just a hunch. But he's tunneling Lenny pretty hard
Now if he tunneled both Lenny and KON in his message it would be too obvious that he is the guy, so instead he targeted Lenny and MTC so nobody would think twice about it. REVERSE REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY
This was confusing before and is still confusing now. It sounds like AtA is thinking way too much.
it seems you are the one discouraging discussion now. By your logic you should be lynched. Even if I did think too much into it, I was creating discussion and giving my viewpoints. Ya know, the whole point of WW. I see nothig wrong with it since I didn't actually jump to conclusions and vote for grant
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
Dogger is just acting suspicious. He's acting very similarly to some of the people in te last game I played who were wolves when they were in fear of getting lynched so it really makes me thing he is scum.
I actually can't think of anyone who actually did that, except for possibly Scorched Feathers.
this is one of the most contradictory statements I've ever heard. You literally gave an example of my theory being correct, in a statement trying to prove my theory incorrect. It doesn't matter if there were 10 people or 1 person, the point is that someone did it and that someone was a wolf. Therefore their behavior was "wolf-like" (even if they were the ones to fire use such behavior). Again it was an opinion
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
How do we do that. Do you have an ability that can bring people back to life? If not, why did you even mention that
This is the second time AtA asked a dodge question. Dogger had claimed only a few posts back. How could he forgot that??
i specifically recall asking for a summary of when I was away. That wasn't in the summary, you quoted almost all of my posts, except that one? Lol
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
If you claimed I might believe you
And I mean FULL role claim
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
Not everyone is under suspicion or at least has good reasons to save them
It is possible that either
A) an active has your name
B) a scum member has your name (idk why they would)
C) Luis gave you a safe claim name at the beginning (that was talked about in the general discussion thread)
If you were going to die anyways, I would see no reason why you can't full claim.
And now AtA is tunneling Dogger for a claim. Gathering information for the scum?
And these points...
A) What? Wouldn't the player have claimed already?
that was supposed to say in-active, I post from a phone so that's probably what happened
B) Makes sense.
C) The General Discussion Thread? You make it sound like you have a QT... or some type of OC.
ahahahahahahahaha I laugh at you because you are doing exactly what you called me out on. You said I didn't bother to read all the info or "recall" all of it. This is the "forum games general discussion" thread I'm referring to. You were apart of that arguement iirc so by your logic you should get lynched for not recalling that information. *lol qt*
All in short:
AtA had scummy RVS [/b] I don't rvs[/b]
AtA has been 'forgotting', or ignoring, recent posts.
that happened once? So I believe you mean "post"
AtA's logic is getting quite flawed.
and yours is quite contradictory...
AtA is tunneling - or gathering - a role from Dogger.
so are a lot of people (not necessarily on dogger) why don't we lynch them?
That's my suspicion with reasoning. What do other people think?
I'm also fine with the lynch of either Grant or Lenny, probably Grant so we can see if his lead on Lenny is legit.