Ladies and gents, today we are accusing
TheGuy under the charges of murder and wolfiness!
Note that this is going through all slightly meaningful posts that he has made.
TheGuy said:
Teal is a huge suspect IMO. His wording about what he knew about quick topics seemed like more than simple speculation and thus is could be logically concluded that he is part of a QT which is generally Anti-Town. Certainly there's a higher percentage that he's Anti-Town than a random person which is enough reason to lynch on Day 1.
This was Day 1, and sorta coming out of RVS. Now, TheGuy has done a classically scummy thing here, which is fuelling the wagon without actually placing a vote on there himself. This is especially scummy on Day 1, where votes are p much dispensable. When I was reading through Day 1 to try and find a lead early on, this is what got my alarm bells ringing, so I decided to look into TheGuy further, and I found quite a bit here which would be otherwise easily lost, as he hasn't made a large amount of posts.
I'm all for voicing my opinion on an issue, you'll find that most all of my posts comment on the most important issue currently being discussed - whether it's for or against a lynch
TheGuy said:
OMGUS. This has pushed me over the edge.
##UNVOTE: PMJ
##VOTE: Teal
He did later vote for Teal, but for OMGUS? D1 OMGUS doesn't really count. This was still p much RVS, remember.
The first quote you used was "sorta comin out of RVS" as you said and now this one a day later is "p much RVS", you can't say that something that starts the game is happening after it ends, that doesn't make any sense. I also believe its fairly reasonable to vote for someone for OMGUS when the initial accusation was somewhat reasonable, which it was.
TheGuy said:
Since my last post I've been getting a serious vibe from Drac's posts that he knew something more than we did - this revelation has come at no surprise.
##UNVOTE: Teal
##VOTE: GM Draclord
Oh yup, yup guys! I knew it all along!
Note: When TheGuy finally decided to lynch Drac, he already had
8 votes on him. Just saying "OK guys, this lynch seems good, I'll go with it" is fine, but saying "I knew it all along but decided not to say anything!" is not. I'm not sure whether I think TheGuy is indie or wolf as of yet (though I'm confident that he's not town), but this is the main thing that's telling me he's indie.
I read a lot of posts at once, Drac looked suspicious, was revealed as an Indie, and got eight votes all in the difference of the last time I'd logged in.
TheGuy said:
I'm going to come to the defense of Keeper. People shouldn't be posting just for the sake of reaching some kind of posting minimum. Posting 92 times in one day without any substance to give in 50 of them isn't great for the town. As long as people are consistently posting when they have something important to say, then they're posting enough. It's just as scummy to not post at all as it is to post unnecessarily many many times in my opinion. Keeper will be doing what I'm usually doing (expect for today because of this ridiculous 10 post minimum), reading and keeping up with the thread but not feeling the need to post about every single subject (many times multiple times) reiterating the same points that have already been brought up by that person already and others.
He's actually defending himself here, not Keeper. Note that he says that what Keeper is doing is a good strategy, and it's "doing what I'm usually doing", which in turn means that TheGuy is performing a good strategy. Subtle
Sure, I'm defending myself too but I'd do the same thing if I had the time to be active and post a lot of times during the day. It's what I honestly believe, Keeper was just randomly the person accused at the time.
TheGuy said:
xDoggerx... your response?
Seems like a slip to me. ##VOTE: Machamp the Champion
This is pressure, right? Well, no. If you guys can remember the Dogger incident well, you will know that Dogger "slipped", but the original case-maker, Teal, decided to put pressure on the other person "involved" in said slip, MtC. TheGuy was second to bandwagon on this, but he voted for MtC instead of Dogger. This is because he could see some kind of bandwagon forming from the case (it was a good case) and wanted to back the winning horse.
While it is true that soon afterwards, a couple more people joined the lynch (bbninjas, KoN, OAP) these people provided further insight in their posts, and it wasn't just a wagon. TheGuy's was no more than what I quoted, and that rubs me up the wrong way.
Never heard of simply placing a bit more pressure?
TheGuy said:
I have never read or watched Harry Potter so if someone claims a character I actually know (Harry, Ron, Hermione, Dumbeldore) then it's probably in the game because I don't think I know any others.
The only thing saving Dogger right now is his claim because his logic hasn't been sound about anything. I'd certainly advise against voting for Keeper at all unless Dogger can provide some good reasons for why we should. I'm still worried about dogger though. He could have easily claimed Hermione, anticipating Hermione to be an important role and if he's going to be lynched anyways - he may as well reveal to his fellow scum members the identity of an important character. And from what I've seen there's no way dogger's played 100+ WW games.
##UNVOTE: Machamp the Champion
Just wanted to point out that he protected KoN hard here. He also echoed what others had said at the time, which is exactly what he said he DOESN'T like doing in the earlier quote in which he also protected KoN. I know it's a small thing, but it's worth noting.
TheGuy said:
The problem with an MTC lynch is that the evidence against MTC was tied to Dogger - I don't really think he was scummy before dogger's supposed slip. At this point I would definitely lean towards a Lenny or Dogger lynch. Lenny had been acting very strange when accused and dogger is by no means cleared in my book.
What? "Don't lynch MTC he is tied to Dogger and Dogger is good but we should lynch Dogger because Dogger is in no way cleared!" What was he even getting at here? Spreading confusion?
Dogger accusing random people (in this case Keeper) without revealing his evidence isn't scummy and worthy of a lynch? But I'm not allowed to be less suspicious of MTC even though I had no reason to believe he was scum other than the connection with dogger?
TheGuy said:
Why not? I think that Lenny over reacted to a silly argument against him. I'm suspicious of grant for putting forth a silly argument that didn't have any evidence to back it up but I'm suspicious of Lenny because of his reaction to it. It's pretty simple.
"I'm not connected to anyone so if I die you have nothing to go off of in terms of wolf partners!" This was a two-sided argument, and saying that both sides of scum is for the most part flawed. It can be genius in certain situations, but this wasn't one of them, so it was once again TheGuy pretending to be contributing.
Camoclone likes to push his opinion and attack others that disagree with him and I was combating because it contradicted my opinion. You attack me for echoing and then attack me for going against the majority opinion - that's a bit contradictory.?
TheGuy said:
I'm thinking Celever didn't even realize he was role fishing - He may have asked a dumb question that helped the scum team but that doesn't make him scum. It seems as though quite a few players seem to be playing differently this game which doesn't necessarily help us (Camoclone, Lenny, Celever).
Echoing others.
Echoing who?
TheGuy said:
So, someone or something has already voted for Teal.
Pointing out the obvious.
I barely noticed it and normally wouldn't have, I thought it was important information to tell.
TheGuy said:
The early role reveal works both ways. Part of me thinks he can't be scum because he had his role out so quickly. (I can easily see a new player easily claim like that). However, part of me thinks he's more suspicious because that claim was definitely unwarranted and he may have just wanted to post his newly written fake claim.
Echoing
TheGuy said:
That's really poor play, rev. Well, we get our second easy lynch of the game - I'll take those any day.
##UNVOTE: Squirtle Squad
##VOTE: rev3rsor
It definitely feels like he sorta talking TO rev here, don't you think? Obviously if TheGuy were an indie, he would just use the QT, or so you'd think, but IDK. It still seems sorta wolfy.
It was poor play, you can't disagree with that.
TheGuy said:
This post is reason enough for me to vote for you. This Lenny thing is over.
##VOTE: grant1999
I'm confused about this. "This Lenny thing is over." When? I don't remember Lenny being cleaned? I don't like how condescending and damning he was when he said that, especially because he was umming and ahhing just one day before this (we're at the start of Day 4 now).
grant was tunnelling something that was long past its expiration date