(Make sure you read the post below first before reading this one)
When you're given problems to find the order of a reaction, you'll be given data for several experiments, each of which will have the initial concentrations of all reactants (given in M, usually), plus the rates of the reactions themselves (my book gives it in mol/L * s). To solve for the exponents (which will be the unknowns in your problems), you'll need to compare two experiments together via division.
As an example, I'll give you the example my book uses. The reaction it gives is:
NH4+ (aq) + NO2- -> N2 (g) + 2 H2O (l)
(Ammonium and nitrite react to give nitrogen gas and water.)
The data it gives is in 4 columns, with the columns from left to right being Experiment, Initial Concentration of NH4+ (in M), Init. Conc. of NO2- (in M), and Initial Rate (in M * s). Data is as follows:
1 _______ 0.100 M _______ 0.0050 M _______ 1.35 x 10^-7
2 _______ 0.100 M _______ 0.0100 M _______ 2.70 x 10^-7
3 _______ 0.200 M _______ 0.0100 M _______ 5.40 x 10^-7
The rate law for the reaction would be:
Rate = k * [NH4+]^m * [NO2-]^n
We are given the rate as well as initial concentrations, and we're told to find what the overall order of the reaction is. To do so, we solve for m and n.
First step is to compare two reactions. Let's start by comparing 1 and 2, since the NH4+ concentration remains constant and we can cancel it out.
Rate 1 = 1.35 x 10^-7 M * s = k * (0.100 M)^m * (0.0050 M)^n
Rate 2 = 2.70 x 10^-7 M * s = k * (0.100 M)^m * (0.0100 M)^n
I got these figures by just taking data from the table, and plugging it into the rate law. We can actually solve for n right now by taking the ratio of the two rates - dividing them together:
Rate 2 / Rate 1
=
2.70 x 10^-7 M * s / 1.35 x 10^-7 M * s
=
k * (0.100 M)^m * (0.0100 M)^n /
k * (0.100 M)^m * (0.0050 M)^n
You can do a lot of cancelling out here. The two M * s terms divide nicely to give you 2.00, the ks drop out, the [NH4+]^m both drop out, and the two [NO2-]^n terms can be combined, leaving you with:
2.00 = (2.00)^n
Now we know n = 1. Note that result, and put it aside for later while we solve for m. This time we're going to compare experiments 2 and 3, since the two [NO2-]^n terms will cancel out so we can solve for m. Here's how that will look:
Rate 3 / Rate 2
=
5.40 x 10^-7 M * s / 2.70 x 10^-7 M * s
=
k * (0.200 M)^m * (0.0100 M)^n /
k * (0.100 M)^m * (0.0100 M)^n
After cancellation and combining terms, we get:
2.00 = (2.00)^m
So m = 1 as well! With that, we can safely say that this reaction is first-order with respect to ammonium (since m = 1), is first-order with respect to nitrite (since n = 1), and is second-order overall (since m + n = 2).
Solving for order of a reaction and stuff follows much the same pattern. First, note the reaction itself, and draw up your rate law based on the aqueous reactants (sorry, I should have mentioned that earlier!), Rate = k * [A]^m * ^n * [C]^o * [...]. Next, look at the table you're given. To solve for an exponent (m, n, o...), you want to compare 2 experiments for which the concentration of only one reactant differs, and all the others will cancel out. Do that for each one, then add up the exponents and you'll have your answer!
(I'm checking to see if there's more stuff to say on the matter. I haven't gotten into the integral rate law yet, but that should cover most of the basic rate law problems, if you're solving things in respect to concentration!)