First of all you say I’m trying to make chaos but the post you chose to show this (when I misread what camo said about a policy lynch) was an active attempt to question what camo was saying so we could advance the conversation.
What do you mean by this? Do you mean that SM defended himself and there are no longer any points against him? If so then why are we lynching himSM at this point is all but a policy lynch. He is too scummy to risk keeping around.
I think you missed the word "but"
I did?
Otherwise, I don't understand how you got that from his post.
Camo said it’s a policy lynch so I’m asking if you have defended all the points Camo brought up against you and if you have then there’s not really a reason to lynch you
OK, I am not a native speaker, so correct me if I'm wrong- "all but a policy lynch"="everything except a policy lynch"? That's why I said you probably missed the "but".
Oh
Yeah ignore what I was saying I misread Camo’s post sorry
Lol, really? Maybe since I just read all of the posts without being as deep into this meaningful conversation, I missed out on the true value of this amazingly productive post.
I think I know what I read
It feels like you’re grasping at straws to make a case on me so you can push a lynch sooooo.
Tell me- why would I need to grasp at straws to make a case on you? There were already Camo, Nick, and Mord cases that I could have just hopped on, which probably would have taken waay less effort to push a lynch for.