Card Slinger J said:There's something I've been wondering about in regards to Protect Cube, say you have Protect Cube attached to your Active Mewtwo EX and they use X-Ball with their Mewtwo EX, does that mean that the opponent's Mewtwo EX wouldn't be able to use X-Ball due to your Active Mewtwo EX having Protect Cube attached since it doesn't receive any damage from it's own attacks?
I think that Protect Cube obviously refers only to the recoil damage from your own Active Pokémon attacks, not to the normal damage from the opponent's active Pokémon attacks...Card Slinger J said:There's something I've been wondering about in regards to Protect Cube, say you have Protect Cube attached to your Active Mewtwo EX and they use X-Ball with their Mewtwo EX, does that mean that the opponent's Mewtwo EX wouldn't be able to use X-Ball due to your Active Mewtwo EX having Protect Cube attached since it doesn't receive any damage from it's own attacks?
Card Slinger J said:There's something I've been wondering about in regards to Protect Cube, say you have Protect Cube attached to your Active Mewtwo EX and they use X-Ball with their Mewtwo EX, does that mean that the opponent's Mewtwo EX wouldn't be able to use X-Ball due to your Active Mewtwo EX having Protect Cube attached since it doesn't receive any damage from it's own attacks?
Metalizard said:@CardSlingerJ: lol? It's pretty clear Protect Cube is referring to your pokémon attacks, it doesn't matter if the defending pokémon is the same card...
Frost Mage said:I literally ran around my house and clicked my heels together so hard that they're sore now when I saw all of the new Fire-type support. Words cannot describe how amazing this is... A Supporter Catcher is just so perfect and oh my god I can't even *explodes*
You can load it in the next turn if you get the 3 heads. And you only have to discard 1 energy to it.[C] Flare Up: Flip a coin. If heads, search your deck for 3 basic Energy and attach them to this Pokemon. Shuffle your deck afterwards.
[R][C][C][C] Fire Blast: 120 damage. Discard 1 Energy attached to this Pokemon.
3 heads? No, 1 heads = 3 energies so much betterEron said:You can load it in the next turn if you get the 3 heads. And you only have to discard 1 energy to it.
RealSlim said:3 heads? No, 1 heads = 3 energies so much betterEron said:You can load it in the next turn if you get the 3 heads. And you only have to discard 1 energy to it.
I don't think this could be so great, why a Pokémon should not be able to get damage from an identical Pokèmon from the opponent? If you don't want a mirror match, just change your strategy even without a specific Item card... An Item card to block recoil damage is great, an Item card to block mirror matches is not so logical..ECHOxLegend said:I Know its obvious what they mean, but it could be interpreted that way, its own attacks meaning I.E Mewtwo can't receive damage from attacks with the same name as the attacks it can use, it can totally be interpreted that way.
IMO I hope it does mean that because that just makes mirror matches up the more fun, however that would be too OP for whatever silly reason that people always have. I mean my Cobalion deck wouldn't be a good example because Cobalion hits everything whether it be rain or shine or the end of the world, 3 energy=100 damage if hes not paralyzed or asleep that is.
but say, for Yveltal EX, if i'm playing the mirror I now have to change my strategy if they have a Yveltal EX with protect cube up. Im not sure why you would want to tech those in for the rare mirror match, but I would consider it an added effect on top of the implied one that could make some games more interesting, even if it is completely useless in normal situations.
Of course there are probably a ton of cards that could make the game more interesting as a novelty if we just took at different perspective of their translations.
Yeah, hard times are coming for VirGen decks!Eron said:RealSlim said:3 heads? No, 1 heads = 3 energies so much better
Oh... that card is broken!
It's time to troll VirGen!
RealSlim said:I don't think this could be so great, why a Pokémon should not be able to get damage from an identical Pokèmon from the opponent? If you don't want a mirror match, just change your strategy even without a specific Item card... An Item card to block recoil damage is great, an Item card to block mirror matches is not so logical..ECHOxLegend said:I Know its obvious what they mean, but it could be interpreted that way, its own attacks meaning I.E Mewtwo can't receive damage from attacks with the same name as the attacks it can use, it can totally be interpreted that way.
IMO I hope it does mean that because that just makes mirror matches up the more fun, however that would be too OP for whatever silly reason that people always have. I mean my Cobalion deck wouldn't be a good example because Cobalion hits everything whether it be rain or shine or the end of the world, 3 energy=100 damage if hes not paralyzed or asleep that is.
but say, for Yveltal EX, if i'm playing the mirror I now have to change my strategy if they have a Yveltal EX with protect cube up. Im not sure why you would want to tech those in for the rare mirror match, but I would consider it an added effect on top of the implied one that could make some games more interesting, even if it is completely useless in normal situations.
Of course there are probably a ton of cards that could make the game more interesting as a novelty if we just took at different perspective of their translations.
////
let me reword that, its not about me changing my strategy, its about making someone else doing it, that's what makes it interesting, for me anyway, I made my deck and I play how I want you, you change.
Let's say that you battle to someone and he has the same deck as you he has the 4 Protect Cubes in use and so do you, both have 5 Pokémon in use, and the only one with no Protect Cube is something you don't have in your deck.... and you have one Pokémon benched repeated.I don't think this could be so great, why a Pokémon should not be able to get damage from an identical Pokèmon from the opponent?
And should this be fun? Meh.Eron said:Let's say that you battle to someone and he has the same deck as you he has the 4 Protect Cubes in use and so do you, both have 5 Pokémon in use, and the only one with no Protect Cube is something you don't have in your deck.... and you have one Pokémon benched repeated.I don't think this could be so great, why a Pokémon should not be able to get damage from an identical Pokèmon from the opponent?
Now you see.
That's another reason. For your response.
Chrono said:Am I the only one wondering what that weird symbol on Charizard-EX (the 180 HP one) means?
(The holographic symbol over the attacks)