Haunted Water said:ashtavakra said:needs more attractive women...
Umm... I get your point, and I'm going to *slightly* disagree with you there.
Attractive women, yes, but women who know how to strategize effectively. That way, there's less of a chance to drag every other woman down with them by being completely idiotic (aka playing TCG like me) on how they make their decisions. I'd rather win/lose to a token minority because of fair sportsmanship than win against a token minority because of an unfair match-up.
That said, having a percentage of attractive women would probably get a lot more people to play, espescially me.
Not meaning to insult anybody, just stating my opinion. Please don't stone me over it.
you just made my point exactly, I left it open ended and broadened for a reason.
when you go to comic cons or other big conventions there is usually actually what the general public would label as "hot nerds". for example the infamous Pikachu Girl, from a con
in California, who has really been a hit over the web. We never see her at nationals, which would be a nice change of pace. there is nothing against the small woman population we have now, I have just never personally been attracted to any that I have come across, that is just my experience and my own personal opinion. On the contrary, I have seen quite a few attractive Junior Mothers.... Wowy...
But to enlighten the subject, I wouldn't agree if Pokemon went out to these adult nerd conventions and hired on 5 super models in pokemon bikinis sitting at a booth giving out booster packs at all. And we all know it would never happen, because the game is further more, in my eyes dying. Even though over the last 3-4 years competitive tournament population has grown. If you look at the age division, and this is what has happened in any game I've ever come across. When the eldest generation is the oldest age group, eventually the game is going to plateau and drop off the cliff.
We can all agree that the biggest age population in the entire game is probably from 18 to 23ish. So imagine in let's say maybe 9 years. When all these people have children, I'll give the benefit of the doubt that maybe down the road numbers could spike back up potentially because these players would eventually push the tcg onto their kids. But overall the games dying.
Don't know how I got onto that subject, but yeah. Hope everyone is having a wonderful Valentine's Day.
Ysmir said:Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Sounds like to me most of these "needs more attractive women" don't have girlfriends themselves or simply value a player by how hot they are. That's pretty damn vain. My friend Heather from Tennessee runs into this problem a lot (For other games not Pokemon) cause she isn't some Katy Perry or Kate Upton. I rather lose to a girl who by general physical standards is "average" cause she beat my behind based on skill alone rather than gawk at chicks at a prerelease....if you wanna eye candy a girl do so on your own time.
When I met my beloved I didn't know what I was getting into and I fell in love with her cause of who she was not what she looked like. (We met at a online gaming event). In the end, it paid off, cause I'm a man still and I am stimulated by physical assets like any other and it just so happened my beloved is pretty and well endowed. But I don't love her for that I love her cause of the person she is and how she makes me feel.
I think a lot of you younger boys and men need to really sit here and evaluate a woman's worth cause you may just not like it when you are passed by just based solely on looks.
You took that entirely too far... lol...
And it sounds like you are completely and utterly full of yourself.
We don't need your condescending tones on this forum.
And my comment wasn't vain, it was open ended for a topic of discussion.
So to assess my or anybody else's character based on your own experiences of how you perceive the
population of women in the Pokemon Tcg is really drab. Get real.