Why no butterfree? Theres alot of pokemon that evolve on here that don't have there evolutions like No Butterfree, Rapadash, Genger, Weezing, Sandslash, Dodrio.
Why no butterfree? Theres alot of pokemon that evolve on here that don't have there evolutions like No Butterfree, Rapadash, Genger, Weezing, Sandslash, Dodrio.
Yep we need Imakuni?'s Exploud EX line and Shining Imakuni?I didn't think they would actually translate Imakuni?'s Doduo. I think it's the first time they include a spoof card in an English set, iirc.
Edit:
Actually, there was Imakuni? himself in Generations but it's also very recent.
Agreed on the exclusions. There's really no reason to exclude them either. I'd add the Alakazam line to that, as well. And there's no excuse to exclude them because of that nonsense Kadabra issue with Uri Geller because they already solved how to evolve without Kadabra with the Abra from Mysterious Treasures! (That and Rare Candy.) But it seems Pokemon has forgotten about that because that was the last Abra printed, back in 2007--almost 10 years ago. (Probably has been 10 years in Japan.)Base set never had a Butterfree, or any of those other Pokemon for that matter. We didn't see those until Jungle/Fossil. Since Evolutions is just a reprint series, while it would have been nice to see them, it also wouldn't have made much sense (even though there is a few inconsistencies like Mew). The actual exclusion of lines like Bulbasaur, Squirtle, Dratini, etc is probably the bigger issue.
Raichu is a holo.I wished they atleast kept the Japanese holo pattern.
Is that little Raichu even holo or regular rare?
If they included the Venusaur and Blastoise line, the complaints about this set would have been much less if any. If they included these six cards it would've been better for all parties, which would make the set more sought after. They just needed to change some numbers and attack description.