Oh, I forgot. I'm not sure that baby legendaries are a good idea, really; legendaries are supposed to be, and have always been, the monstrous powerhouses they are today, if they were even capable of breeding (which in itself brings the problem of how can there be multiple dialgas, for example, if just one dialga is supposed to control all of time).
BUT, I would agree on this for mythical pokemon (like the events) or even some trios, like the bird trio (since the entei trio and the muskedeers have backstories that establish them as how they are now).
And... I'm not saying this because I think that Baby Meloetta would be the cutest thing in the world, of course.
The technical precedent here would be Phione (meaning you can breed a weaker version of Lugia with Ditto, but that one is a separate species whcih cannot evolve into a proper Lugia), but their design/look wouldn't necessarily have to be baby-like.
If we look at some epic legend like Dialga as being so strong that it could very well be considered a stage higher than your typical final stage of 3, then it would make sense if their pseudo-"baby"-version wasn't baby at all, but more like something between "Charmeleon" and "Charizard" in terms of personality.
For example, Ho-oh Jr. would look as mature as a Fearow, it just isn't a true Ho-oh and never will be.
These would be weaker, breedable versions of the epic legends that are banned by default, allowing those legends to participate in at least some form. So you'd have a proper Ho-oh either as a trophy or for uber battles, but if you wanted to use it competitively, you go for the pseudo-baby version of it.
That's what I had in mind.