I really don't get why Zoroark is a big deal when you can just Sudowoodo or Parallel City your problems away.
lol tell that to the people in Japan running Zoroark as their main Pokemon!Well the first thing is almost no decks in standard play either right now, more so Sudowoodo than Parallel City. I haven't seen a single meta relevant deck since rotation play Sudowoodo.
Second thing is that the draw ability is the biggest reason to include it.
The biggest thing shutting down Zoroark GX right now is....wait for it.....Gardevoir GX! It resists dark by 20, and it has Gallade to OHKO all Zoroark GXs. And the most recent top lists of Gardevoir GX are running Sylveon GX and Parallel City, which destroy your bench size.
Our meta just isn't structured correctly for Zoroark GX to be a main attacker. Only practical use I can see it in right now is Gardevoir GX for the Metagross match up while giving you draw power in every other match up. Looks like another year of Gardy decks.
lol tell that to the people in Japan running Zoroark as their main Pokemon!
You just said one of the most popular decks right now (Golisopod GX/Anything) is unplayable. 120 for one energy on a beefy Stage 1 has already been proven to be good; and Zoroark needs less to work than Golisopod and comes with built-in consistency.Japan's Standard format is XY-on so you can't use their format as an example. They still have access to Sky Field, which absolutely makes a difference in Zoroark's ability to be a main attacker. Sorry, but being damaged capped at 120 before any damage modifiers is not enough to be a main attacker in this format.
You just said one of the most popular decks right now (Golisopod GX/Anything) is unplayable. 120 for one energy on a beefy Stage 1 has already been proven to be good; and Zoroark needs less to work than Golisopod and comes with built-in consistency.
Lele for Bridgette, then bench one more Pokémon. It's not hard.I'm not saying that at all. You're leaving out the fact that Zoroark GX NEEDS a completely full bench just to hit 120 damage, so your argument is completely flawed.
Lele for Bridgette, then bench one more Pokémon. It's not hard.
Agreed; but the same goes for Golisopod, and if you don't have a full bench for Zoroark, you suffer a lot less then you would if you didn't switch Goli out of the active.Maybe, maybe not. You can't assume that you're going to have a full bench throughout the entire game. Zoroark's ability is consistent, but it's damage output is not.
My point exactly.Japan's Standard format is XY-on so you can't use their format as an example. They still have access to Sky Field, which absolutely makes a difference in Zoroark's ability to be a main attacker. Sorry, but being damaged capped at 120 before any damage modifiers is not enough to be a main attacker in this format.
My point exactly.
Agreed; but the same goes for Golisopod, and if you don't have a full bench for Zoroark, you suffer a lot less then you would if you didn't switch Goli out of the active.
I know you really like being right, so allow me to lay it out for ya:When Duo said that our format isn't structured for Zoroark to be a main attacker, you responded with:
"lol tell that to the people in Japan running Zoroark as their main Pokemon!"
So I don't know what you mean by your point exactly, when your point was proven wrong.
I know you really like being right, so allow me to lay it for ya:
From my experience with the deck, Zoroark just doesn't work out as a main attacker. I've come across too many Gallades than I'd hoped for, and like I said earlier, Sudowoodo and Parallel City make it too easy to limit the attack power. If anything, it makes an ok support Pokemon, especially when you have a whole chain of them.
With this knowledge, and being in agreement with what you said, I was pretty surprised to find that Zoroark was a thing in Japan. I was not aware of the format difference.
So no, I wasn't proven wrong. That never happens
And just because I'm right doesn't mean you need to be rude about itNice passive aggressive post.
You do know that this is supposed to be a discussion, right? Typically in a discussion people share their arguments. Just because my argument is supported by logic doesn't mean you need to rude about it.
And just because I'm right doesn't mean you need to be rude about it