No. See my previous reply. Basically choice band adds 30 for each attack. An attack is determined by its name, not the amount of times damage is decided.Yes.
No. See my previous reply. Basically choice band adds 30 for each attack. An attack is determined by its name, not the amount of times damage is decided.
A Dark Malamar would be incredibly apt. They did metal and electric magnezone, when not malamar. I'd be surprised if they don't. Otherwise hoopa will be relegated to expanded, where it will be tied with Lapras, and worse than buzzwole.That seems to be correct. Had to look up a ruling for Brozong Break which also had an attack that allowed one to hit any Pokémon for 30x the number of energies discarded and also enabled one to choose the same Pokémon more than once. Unfortunately it has been ruled that Choice Band does not factor in cumulatively but only once and only for the active Pokémon obviously. Nevertheless the GX attack is still rather versatile. From my point of view the viability of this card will depend on whether we get some acceleration cards for Darkness Pokémon such as Dark Patch or a Darkness version of Malamar.
No, you are right. Although in Expanded, it is much easier to get rolling thanks to Dark patch and Max Elixir. If we don’t get much Dark support for Standard, I can see this being a great tech in Dark decks in Expanded for the GX attack alone.Hoopa is a weaker Buzz. You are triggered. Respond if you are.
It's better than no-text attacks.Getting a little tired of triple energy "this Pokemon can't attack next turn" moves. Can we get some more interesting attackers please?