That is what I fear. I would like to see something done about this pretty soon. I think its time for easy to get locks to leave the game entirely. They need to put a quick ban on Garbodor or there will be a problem with the format again.
@crystal_pidgeot I don't think a ban is right, but I believe that your game mechanics internal core strive toward a historic thought process is refreshing, and more like mine.
A game at all times should never levy a stronger position over another opponent without giving an opponent a path to counter through the mechanics. In other words, all games, from Sorry to chess are built with a ying/yang balance that allows every game mechanism to be fair. It's up to the player to choose the game mechanism knowing that at all times there is a deep routed counter for the mechanism.
In game design, this type of high level process thinking is lost on a lot of upcoming designers that strive to put humorous flaws into games as praises to their cleverness.
Pokemon, though beloved by many, including myself, love this type of praise and cleverness. If they didn't, they wouldn't do it. There is just a deeper philosophy and ego that goes into game design that is hard to understand from a players side of things.
But, ya, I can't agree with the ban, but it's refreshing to hear that the belief is still there.
They can fix this by making Tool Scrapper or Megaphone a promo card through league or something but something needs to be done.
Yes. I agree. I think hard counters should be presented when a gap is left hanging in the wind. I also agree with creating a promo card like Tool Scrapper and Megaphone. I'll just be surprised if they do anything about it. I think it is just one of those things where ego and philosophy meet and a designer is cracking up cause it was his intention. Game designers do it all the time. They create flaws in a game, knowing that it will need to patch later, but it is their clever sense humor that keeps them in control of the game.
A designer knew this would happen probably 18 months ago, and just smirked in a meeting.
Nobody really even knows what it will look like, it would be a little soon to call things so drastic. The format will likely change in ways that haven't been anticipated.
On a side note you can always lysandre-up that pokemon and take a shot at it. They've hinted that attacks that get rid of tools should be more meaningful, but as with stadiums, the effect is most important during your turn. The attack ends your turn so the opponent can just play another tool card (I'm guessing that garb decks will have plenty of tools). I know not all abilities are important just during your turn (such as safeguard type abilities), but most of the more powerful abilities are activated during your turn.
That is what I fear. I would like to see something done about this pretty soon. I think its time for easy to get locks to leave the game entirely. They need to put a quick ban on Garbodor or there will be a problem with the format again.
I don't believe Garbodor needs to be banned: the only two cards recently banned have been Shiftry (NXD), and Lysandre's Trump Card (PHF), both of these cards were busted and broken, with almost no counter.
Since Seedot and Nuzleaf were both grass types, you could just Forest of Giant Plant them to evolution to Shiftry in your first turn, and then spam Giant Fan with Super Scoop Up, Recycle, and Devolution Spray, when combined with Trick Coin, a deck revolving around Shiftry could just get rid of your opponent's Pokémon on the first turn, making the card busted, since the opponent had no control over the outcome.
Lysandre's Trump Card simply allowed you to abuse trainers like Enhanced Hammer, Crushing Hammer, VS Seeker, etc., while shuffling all your cards into your deck preventing decking out, allows you to go through your entire deck and then Trump Card your discard pile back in once you found what you needed with no consequences, and it just made games to slow and lengthy.
Garbodor is not like these, while yes, ability lock is frustrating, not all decks use them. Shiftry and Trump Card affected all decks across the board. There are also ways to counter Garbodor, just Lysandre it out and KO it, use Hex Maniac and use your abilities and then reuse it turn after turn with VS Seeker. You couldn't counter the other two. Shiftry could win on the first turn, not even giving the opponent a chance to try most of the time, before they were left with no Pokémon, and Trump Card was a trainer, so you had no control over it. While many, (myself included) may not like Garbodor, a ban is not needed nor should it happen. It may be unhealthy for the format, but it's not broken or just horribly designed. And if Garbodor could be an issue just throw in an extra copy of Lysande or Hex Maniac.
I don't believe Garbodor needs to be banned: the only two cards recently banned have been Shiftry (NXD), and Lysandre's Trump Card (PHF), both of these cards were busted and broken, with almost no counter.
Since Seedot and Nuzleaf were both grass types, you could just Forest of Giant Plant them to evolution to Shiftry in your first turn, and then spam Giant Fan with Super Scoop Up, Recycle, and Devolution Spray, when combined with Trick Coin, a deck revolving around Shiftry could just get rid of your opponent's Pokémon on the first turn, making the card busted, since the opponent had no control over the outcome.
Lysandre's Trump Card simply allowed you to abuse trainers like Enhanced Hammer, Crushing Hammer, VS Seeker, etc., while shuffling all your cards into your deck preventing decking out, allows you to go through your entire deck and then Trump Card your discard pile back in once you found what you needed with no consequences, and it just made games to slow and lengthy.
Garbodor is not like these, while yes, ability lock is frustrating, not all decks use them. Shiftry and Trump Card affected all decks across the board. There are also ways to counter Garbodor, just Lysandre it out and KO it, use Hex Maniac and use your abilities and then reuse it turn after turn with VS Seeker. You couldn't counter the other two. Shiftry could win on the first turn, not even giving the opponent a chance to try most of the time, before they were left with no Pokémon, and Trump Card was a trainer, so you had no control over it. While many, (myself included) may not like Garbodor, a ban is not needed nor should it happen. It may be unhealthy for the format, but it's not broken or just horribly designed. And if Garbodor could be an issue just throw in an extra copy of Lysande or Hex Maniac.
Garbodor wont have any counter so based on what you said, should be banned. Also, you seem to have little understanding of how cards work. How does one use Hex Maniac and then use abilities? Really, I would like to know!
Unhealthy cards need to be removed from the format. This can't be argued.
I think Raichu and Medicham actually have a chance as a T3 or T4 deck. With Raichu (AKA poor man's Mega Rayquaza,) it gets Zebstrika (which I luv dat card,) to have a funny potential rogue deck. Medicham keeps Strong Energy and gains Regirock and Carbink, but alas it is also a poor man's Zygarde deck.
I can see M Mewtwo-EX (Y) being very strong in this format.
It was only really being held back by Night March (as Pumpkaboo hit for weakness and won the prize trade) but now that's gone it will be interesting to see how it does. I don't think it really loses anything major from the rotation and it doesn't have an absolute reliance on Abilities, so Garbodor shouldn't be too much of an issue.
I wouldn't be surprised if the format starts shifting back towards Mega Pokemon but, on the other hand, now that the main Item lock decks have either been rotated (Trevenant XY, Seismitoad-EX) or taken a big hit (Vespiquen/Vileplume) Stage 2 Pokemon become a bit more viable as you can slap down those Rare Candies a bit more.
I mean, i'm reading some steam siege cards and they seem to be leaning towards mega pokemon. who knows.