Honestly, this is how sets should be handled. At least for rarities and pull rates. (Though, that 1 in 15 chance for a Shining Pokemon card is very unfortunate...) Not a single non-holo rare to be seen, non-holo Stage 2's are just uncommon while their lower evolutions are both commons, a holo and reverse holo in every pack, and GX pull rates are slightly above average.
If only regular sets were like this. But no. Non-holo rares apparently need to continue to be a thing to pad out pull rates. You'll be lucky if you get one of each holo in a set after two booster boxes now, and you'll only scratch the surface, as far as ultra rares go. Every booster box 'needs' to contain 24 non-holo rares and a combination of 12 holos and ultra rares. (Though, if you're super lucky, you'll get 13 holos/ultra rares. Oh, boy!)
"What's that? The set size and ultra rare count are a lot higher than they've ever been? Don't change anything other than decrease the pull rates for ultra rares!" -TPCi
Geez... Even when I'm happy for a TCG product now, my frustration with TPCi can't resist coming out. =|
If only regular sets were like this. But no. Non-holo rares apparently need to continue to be a thing to pad out pull rates. You'll be lucky if you get one of each holo in a set after two booster boxes now, and you'll only scratch the surface, as far as ultra rares go. Every booster box 'needs' to contain 24 non-holo rares and a combination of 12 holos and ultra rares. (Though, if you're super lucky, you'll get 13 holos/ultra rares. Oh, boy!)
"What's that? The set size and ultra rare count are a lot higher than they've ever been? Don't change anything other than decrease the pull rates for ultra rares!" -TPCi
Geez... Even when I'm happy for a TCG product now, my frustration with TPCi can't resist coming out. =|