Gothitelle V Vileplume

glaceon said:
No they do not. I do not see a place for either of them in most competitive decks. Could you explain?

Neither of them are good techs because they require backup making them work. Gothitelle is bad without Reuniclus, and same with most Vileplume variants.
Click to expand...
It's not so much that Vileplume is bad as a tech because it needs Reuniclus (it doesn't), but it's that it can't be used alongside trainers. Your point that they're bad techs still stands, though.
 
What I mean as a tech is that they are great support as bench sitters. Although you need to build a deck around it, does that make it bad?
 
pokemonjoe said:
What I mean as a tech is that they are great support as bench sitters. Although you need to build a deck around it, does that make it bad?
Click to expand...

It makes it bad as a tech card.

In a deck that ca consistently set up Vileplume where Vileplume causes no problems, then Vileplume is good. Is it not a good tech because mjor edits have to be made for Vileplume to work and with the deck still being consistent, which is why its a bad tech.
 
Ok, I mis...typed? lol What I meant was that they a great cards that in vileplume's case, sit on the bench providing great support. I get now that it may be bad as a tech, but that's not what I was trying to say. What I was trying to say is taht they are good support, even if you have to build a deck around them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top