Garb at 160? Well shoot
No pls I fanGuardians Wailord with this hehehehehehehehe
;-; whyGuardians Wailord with this hehehehehehehehe
Mega Pokémon are not stage one Pokémon . Could be an awesome card for stage one decks that can keep their tools around or benefit from it through healing. Could see this in a Alolan Ninetales decks. People panic a little too much about Field Blower. It is an awesome card but most deck have issues to include more than two of them. Decks still get value from their tools like they did in the XY format when Startling Megaphone was around.
Seriously, those Seattle results are ridiculous. For all those thinking we would get creative deck building again, I present Seattle as exhibit a on why that is 100 percent incorrect.
Well, to be fair, every non Rayquaza, Mewtwo and Gardevoir Mega are pretty fair but I'd one up you here and say most cards now (even some GX cards) are poorly designed.
Could not disagree more. In fact some of the cards designed for once force the players to become more creative in exploring means to achieve aims that items accomplished previously. An example is the inclusion of either Bridgette or/and Pokémon Fan Club to set up. There are much more incentives hidden in this set to become a little more creative and deviate from classic net-deck formulas. Keep in mind that common definitions of creativity include novely combinations of existing ideas and usefulness for a certain purpose. In order for an idea to be considered creative it has to meet both requirements.
In terms of entire new thactics there is not much new stuff. In fact this can be said for allmost all sets. You still have beatdown, stall and control. It does not matter much which Pokémon serve as an instance of these three tactics since the core idea will remain identical. However there is a lot of creativity left in the set to be explored. You just need to be willing to analyze the cards and think a little outside of common schemes.
I do not have a lot of detailed or were able to follow the stream but a Water Box deck appearetly mode top cut too. We already had a discussion that Water Box could be able to deal with Garbodor variants because it can be faster than them and set up at any time in the game. Other examples could be Tapu Bulu and a few other decks.
Another argument advanced in favor of the position that Garbodor is bad for the meta is that it turns Pokémon into rock-paper-scizor. To tell the truth this is part of the design of the game since BW and XY. There are counters for almost all cards and decks in the game. The basic idea is to adjust or chose a deck depending on the expected meta. From a buissness point of view this is a clever design since you may be forced to switch decks during the season, which requires you to have a sufficient card pool to start with. This in turn can help to increase sales.
And all that creativity turned into 25ish of the top 32 decks being some variation of drampa espeon or tauros and Garbodor. That's no longer creative. That's the archetype. Is it using a slightly different archetype than the previous one? Barely. Including fan club or brigette and still keeping the same baseline 25 trainers isn't exactly ground breaking. But instead of the previous set where we had at least 5 decks that could legitimately win a tournament, we now have one. Awesome.
As for the Vespiquen and water box decks, they were both run by two of the very best players in the world. I would hardly call either a counter.
If this seems like a sky is falling statement, it isn't meant to be. I actually don't have many issues with any of the Garbodor variations unless I am playing something that is just begging to lose to it. But it does make it next to impossible to get through a full tournament without taking a bad loss from one of these decks. They are very easy to use which means they are going to be very popular. I mean, when 75 percent of even the top players ran it, that is telling and it is going to get boring fast.