I don't know why I didn't think about how there would be a secret rare Gardevoir EX in the set. Yet here I was surprised to see it. Ha ha. All three Gardevoir full arts look great. =)
The ranger fits into the same 58/54 slot on both sets, so I believe it is in both.Love the full arts, took me way too long to notice Xerneas/Yveltal in the backgrounds agreed that the Gardevoir FA is too similar to the Primal Clash one though, bit of a shame.
I think they are the same card. The bottom one looks more like a scan and the top one more like a photo, could explain the different lighting. Could be wrong though, but there really is no point in them printing two of the same card with basically the same artwork in one set.
MAYBE, and just MAYBE in a format without nightmarch, but for the most part no. the requirements are too high and the damage ceiling is too low.Is M gardevoir playalabe?
Since when has 0-1 energy cost (with the right setup) for 110 been considered bad? Most megas wish that had that kind of efficiency and while I don't think this is better than the regular Fairy MGarde, it's honestly not bad either because this card destroys M/Mewtwo EX.why it have to be that bad?
The difference maker was Mega manectric accelerated energy for 110.I like to think it could work pretty well with Florges BREAK + Max Potion etc. I mean M Manectric was popular at doing only 110 so this could potentially be if it's useful enough.
The difference maker was Mega manectric accelerated energy for 110.