how about a blastoise/feragilatr/kyurem deck???
Name ( idk yet)
POKEMON: 20
Blastoise, UL-13 (3-1-3)
Feraligatr (Prime), (2-1-2)
3x Druddigon
3x Kyurem
2x Cleffa
TRAINERS: 26
2x Energy Retrieval, BW-92
3x Pokemon Communication, BW-99
2x Pokemon Catcher, EP-95
2x Switch, GS-102
4x Rare Candy, UL-82
4x Professor Oak's New Theory, CL-83
2x Engineer's Adjustments, UL-75
2x Judge, UL-78
3x Pokemon Collector, GS-97
2x Interviewer's Questions, CL-79
ENERGY: 14
14 : Water Energy, BW-107
Scizorliscious said:
^Exactly my thoughts.
The problem is that when you're not KOing the Active about every two turns once you're set up, be prepared to get OHKO'd or 2HKO'd repeatedly by your opponent's Active that you're not really doing a lot about. And you don't get a continual stream of prizes for the most part, and that hurts more than you think it would– good prizes mid-game can keep the attack going.
Gengar Prime had this problem– it couldn't really do anything about getting 2HKO'd repeatedly, whereas other decks could hope to slow the opponent down by KOing stuff. That is, in my opinion, why it got so much hype that just fell through the cracks here.
I agree that Feraligatr would be best to pair with this (although Floatzel+Shaymin certainly is interesting), but Catcher is a problem still. That 3 Retreat Cost is not fun (almost as bad as Emboar's), and this deck would only be able to survive by running a few Switches. But with 2 Catcher and 2 hits, the Feraligatr is gone as soon as it comes up– and less with Reshiram/Zekrom and 2 PlusPowers.
what about this deck?
Name ( idk yet)
POKEMON: 20
Blastoise, UL-13 (3-1-3)
Feraligatr (Prime), (2-1-2)
3x Druddigon
3x Kyurem
2x Cleffa
TRAINERS: 26
2x Energy Retrieval, BW-92
3x Pokemon Communication, BW-99
2x Pokemon Catcher, EP-95
2x Switch, GS-102
4x Rare Candy, UL-82
4x Professor Oak's New Theory, CL-83
2x Engineer's Adjustments, UL-75
2x Judge, UL-78
3x Pokemon Collector, GS-97
2x Interviewer's Questions, CL-79
ENERGY: 14
14 : Water Energy, BW-107