Finished Mafia XXXIX: Superheroes Vs Supervillains - Mafia has won!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, so let's say I do flip as Storm. What do you all do? What would be your next move?
 
Hey, why were you thinking of me? :p This is just an excellent read, but I'm not claiming credit for the action results. Like Cherrim himself said, it's likely but not absolutely her, in the unlikely event he flips town.

This is an awesome post! Frankly it wouldn't go amiss if other inactive players like the ever-impossible to tag Tempest made a post in the similar vein. But another question: who is your top scumread right now? :)
My top scumread would been either cherrim or blaker but more leaning toward blaker after the claim

Wow, you're quick to agree with anything going against me. Drac, can I ask why you didn't share any of this earlier? And Celever, don't you think making scumchat assumptions is a bad idea? Why don't you bring that up when he assumes it about me?...

I almost didnt notice you were redirecting part question to me, its always a good idea to separate question in different paragraph if you trying to ask different question to different people. Sometime people would be not sure sure which part you actually refer to them.



Crrently blaker ability is to convinience, as the ability hardly proveable with his original target got redirected.
 
Warning points for extremely inactive players and possible modkill will be "awarded" today at 5pm EST.
 
So im sitting between the chairs. Or Electrical Lines in my case.
Because rn it is a bit weird.
Blakers seems like an odd case. One of the leaders against a case against him dies as the NK. Then he answers shaky and next his roll card seems faulty (for me my character name is also bold just as an fyi). Also it seems just to convient that he has exactly that role right now
On the other hand we have celever who just jumps around starting waggons and having an... lets say "Initimdating" ability posibly. Am i the only one who thinks its weird he wants to go last with his vote to activate it? No? Ooook.
Problem is. We dont know what it is. What it does. Maybe its a second Indie. I dont know.

So who to vote for? Celever seemed a bit scummy for the whole game. Same goes for Blakers.
If Blakers role card is correct it would be save lynching him now as the person who he has targeted is already dead. Or is that not how it works?
But it could also be that we just kill another Town just for the lulz basically.
Question is: Do we want to have Celever activate his ability what ever it might be or do we want to prevent him from doing that. No matter who gets lynched? Thing is he could also do it by just hammering himself when he knows he is gonna get lynched.

It seems that we devided into two "factions" either #CeleverSquad or #IStandWithBlakers.

We just need to decide . Because the blakers case, even if he is really suspect with his role card, it stands on Celever just pretty much leading it and driving the Lynchbus for one or another shaky reason.
Im not saying either is town or indie or scum.
Im just saying we should look at it with a grain of salt.
And i do like myself some salt let me tell you.
 
I rather have a Celever alive longer even if he appears leading at the moment since he is more active, im sure the last time most of the active guys dies early, lynched, the game slow down. So if its between blakers and celever i rather ##Vote: Blakers
 
The thing about Blakers is the person who was targeting him last was the NK last night, and he doesn't really give s good response either. That wouldn't happen unless Blakers was scum, would it? ##VOTE: Blakers
anybody else whose character name isn't in bold?
My character name is also in bold. I think that's just the way they were supposed to appear.
 
Damn, it didn't save the rest, should say

Someone please remove your vote, it does not help town to have Blakers at L-1 this early into the day
 
The thing about Blakers is the person who was targeting him last was the NK last night, and he doesn't really give s good response either. That wouldn't happen unless Blakers was scum, would it? ##VOTE: Blakers

My character name is also in bold. I think that's just the way they were supposed to appear.

Well, this whole plan by the scum is really quite simple. People were suspicious of me for the entire game. So in order to buy themselves another day, they changed my target to the person who was night killed. Therefore everyone would think that I killed him, and the entire day would consist of you guys following that lead and me trying to defend myself. Thus we would waste a day, I'd be forced to role claim, and then if I somehow made it through the day, they could night kill me. As for the typos, that's just a stroke of luck gone their way to make you all trust me even less. I don't know why nobody else has even considered that this is the case.

And Vracken, if I were to lynch myself, I'd be doing it right now. But that would only help scum.
 
I have been monitoring to check that very fact. Not having done so already is positive in my opinion and while your argument does make sense, I am not sure I buy it largely because that explanation relies on scum believing (or having confirmation) you would be targeted by a watcher. Hard to tell if it is legitimate or a stretch as the argument lends itself to either side.
 
Everyone thought I was scummy. There were good odds that someone would check me. The only other option, while unlikely, was that scum set me up and had Cherrim check me so he could boast that knowledge in-thread. And they only way to prove that true or false is to have Cherrim role claim, which might not be a good idea.
 
##UNVOTE:
I agree L-1 is a bit risky,

Although you have a good argeument regarding a possible scum motives redirecting you. Redirector could also be a town role. Unless the scum is consist of all new players (which is highly not), I don't think making you look suspicious would even be in their plan. I don't see much worth in it.
 
So people, here are my thoughts:
Scum is continuing to kill off experienced players like bbninjas which could mean two things. Scum is either definintely inexperienced or a very experienced player who believes only the most experienced players can understand he is scum.
As far as I can understand, the case on Blakers is that his role seems fake and the night Little Cherrim watched him he targeted a very town player. I am not going to vote for reasons above. And can anybody fully explain what the case is on Blakers, I am still a bit confused.

Reads:
Nothing really except for Blakers a little
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top