esperante said:Maybe you should do a quality test on people before you let them be tutors? Not talking to anyone specifically, but I'm sure you'll get people who think they're a lot more experienced than they really are signing up to help, which isn't really doing new people that much good.
Just my input.
I also agree. It should be like in the Video Game fourm were the tutors are already picked.DawnOfXatu said:esperante said:Maybe you should do a quality test on people before you let them be tutors? Not talking to anyone specifically, but I'm sure you'll get people who think they're a lot more experienced than they really are signing up to help, which isn't really doing new people that much good.
Just my input.
Agreed. Kinda. Some people are already well known and rather skilled at the TCG. It is the people who are realatively unknown that should be checked out first.
Also as I am tutoring 42 Chocolate, I am just kinda writing out various little lessons, which I have saved. So after a while it may just be better to compile a list of lessons and then go from there.
Lou Cypher said:Hmm, a test for this is pretty hard to make. And really, its not the main point here. People should help one another, that is the true main point about this topic.
PokeKid Brandon said:I think that we have enough tutuors seeing that we only have 2 students.
I'm tutoring two! >_>PokeKid Brandon said:I think that we have enough tutuors seeing that we only have 2 students.
trevorispro said:hmm.
I guess I wont tutor and id guess it would be cool to have someone to ask for help and bounce ideas off of.
so if any REALLy good player wants an already capable student who just needs little improvments then please help.