I hope I don't start a flame war with this, but... Personally, I love the design and concept of Kiteruguma. It's a cute pokemon that's clearly lethal and, although it may be possibly based on bear hugs, I like how it's not actually a bear but a red panda. Personally, I can't help but feel like it also has lots of potential as possibly the 7th gen Snorlax. All the hate I'm seeing online I feel is quite immature, as I'm just seeing people left and right say how Kiteruguma is the absolute worst pokemon ever, how they don't want to get the games anymore, and how it's a clear sign GF is dead and whatnot. I personally believe it's more just another pokemon design. I mean, look at Muk, Voltorb, Quagsire, Barboach, Seedot, Dragonite, and many others. They're simply just what they are, nothing special, no deep meaning. Not every pokemon has to have some ambiguous source for their design and inspiration, and I think most of us forget that. Sure Garbodor is literally trash, sure Vanillish is an ice cream cone, sure Kiteruguma is a bear hug, sure Charizard is just a fire-breathing dragon. Does any of that really have to dictate whether or not a pokemon is good or should have been made? Does any of that give us the right to say whether or not an entire generation sucks or GameFreak is giving up or losing ideas? I don't think so. I think it's just us being a bit spoiled and bratty, wanting a lot more pokemon to be like Dialga, Rayquaza, Lucario, and Tyranitar when they don't need to be.
Uhh... With all that being said, I just hope I don't start any trouble and I'm sorry if I did.