Pokemon New or not????
- Thread starter Mudkip DS
- Start date
Oh my... normally i'd probably jump to the fake conclusion... but if they were posted in an official Nintendo magazine then maybe not. I think that it is fake though since that Water pokemon has features on other pokemon. It has Lanturn's headlight, Crobat's wings as feet and it sort of has a Vaporeon tail... You could probably pick its eyes from some other pokemon but I can't tell atm.
I think we're going to need a translation of that Battle scene to see if it's fake or not. If you can get a big scan of that magazine page so we can see things more clearly then it'll be easier to determine if it's real or not.
I think we're going to need a translation of that Battle scene to see if it's fake or not. If you can get a big scan of that magazine page so we can see things more clearly then it'll be easier to determine if it's real or not.
so you live in Holland???
anyways, it seems like an excellent fake, but if it only appeared in a Holland magazine, then I doubt that it will be real
on the second page, the screenshots are real, but the silhouettes, I don't know
BTW, shouldn't the magazine be in dutch if it's from Holland???
anyways, it seems like an excellent fake, but if it only appeared in a Holland magazine, then I doubt that it will be real
on the second page, the screenshots are real, but the silhouettes, I don't know
BTW, shouldn't the magazine be in dutch if it's from Holland???
RE: New or not????
I´m not from Holand.
That screen was an extra in this magazine, it´s all on japenese, i can´t read it, but on the second page, there are comments about this:
We don´t know the names of the Pokemons , but it seems like they are cat and crocodile Pokemon.
Maybe that´s original Pokemons????
cute-mew said:
I´m not from Holand.
That screen was an extra in this magazine, it´s all on japenese, i can´t read it, but on the second page, there are comments about this:
We don´t know the names of the Pokemons , but it seems like they are cat and crocodile Pokemon.
Maybe that´s original Pokemons????
RE: New or not????
2)he cannot be awake 24/7
3) not always, PB seems to have news a lot earlier then they have...
1) don't advertise sites (especially not that site)Lugia-Power said:
2)he cannot be awake 24/7
3) not always, PB seems to have news a lot earlier then they have...
The first one is definitely fake.
It's just a rip of Crobat (you can see his wings) and the sprite isn't done very well.
The rest have potential though.
You never cease to amaze Mudkip DS.
[ChanseyMaster]
It's just a rip of Crobat (you can see his wings) and the sprite isn't done very well.
The rest have potential though.
You never cease to amaze Mudkip DS.
[ChanseyMaster]
It's a fake, judging by the background & image. If you look very closely with a detalhist point of view, you'll see that the fake Pokémon has no contrast with the background. I mean, compare it with a REAL battle scene to see what I mean. And entering in VERY deep graphic details, you'll notice that on its right side (left if WE see it), the leg isn't really blended with the Pokémon. So, definitively fake.
One of the shadows looks like espeon with a huge tail.
The other one reminds me of Bagon.
Also, Lugia-Power. Stop being so sure of yourself. Just because Serebii doesn't have it doesn't mean it's not true. Geez.
EDIT: Now that i think about it, why would he be encountering a fish kinda Pokemon on land? Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and assume the first one's fake, but the other two seem real enough to me.
[ChanseyMaster]
The other one reminds me of Bagon.
Also, Lugia-Power. Stop being so sure of yourself. Just because Serebii doesn't have it doesn't mean it's not true. Geez.
EDIT: Now that i think about it, why would he be encountering a fish kinda Pokemon on land? Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and assume the first one's fake, but the other two seem real enough to me.
[ChanseyMaster]
RE: New or not????
First of all, what i said was not at all spam.
I was introducing some of my own opinions, in fact, opinions that have not been stated about those shadows before. I was adding a possible debate to the topic, and just some insight for other people.
Next I was trying to show another user that not all sites are 100% reliable.
Meanwhile, you only stated a point that is completely useless in the conversation.
"They might be fake, they might not," doesn't add to the conversation. There's nothing else they could be! We already know it's one of the two, it can't be half fake or half legitimate. Essentially, what you said was spam, not I.
Anyway, I still believe the second photo is legit. It was from an actual Nintendo magazine, and doesn't appear to be fake. (unlike the first one) The only way i could see this being a fake, is if someone were to paste over the blank spots that could've had pictures of Pokemon with their own. I kinda doubt this though, because I haven't seen this page anywhere on the net before. Thanks again Mudkip DS.
Mudkip DS, was the first one in the same magazine? If so, I would question the credability of that magazine.
[ChanseyMaster]
CastformCloud said:
First of all, what i said was not at all spam.
I was introducing some of my own opinions, in fact, opinions that have not been stated about those shadows before. I was adding a possible debate to the topic, and just some insight for other people.
Next I was trying to show another user that not all sites are 100% reliable.
Meanwhile, you only stated a point that is completely useless in the conversation.
"They might be fake, they might not," doesn't add to the conversation. There's nothing else they could be! We already know it's one of the two, it can't be half fake or half legitimate. Essentially, what you said was spam, not I.
Anyway, I still believe the second photo is legit. It was from an actual Nintendo magazine, and doesn't appear to be fake. (unlike the first one) The only way i could see this being a fake, is if someone were to paste over the blank spots that could've had pictures of Pokemon with their own. I kinda doubt this though, because I haven't seen this page anywhere on the net before. Thanks again Mudkip DS.
Mudkip DS, was the first one in the same magazine? If so, I would question the credability of that magazine.
[ChanseyMaster]
I agree with Anhorsen and cute-mew. It does look like an excelent but obvious fake but it was shown in an offivial Pokemon magazine. Although... I do have to point out three things that are out of the ordinary:
-It has too many knick-knacks and objects on it's skin, i.e. the rings to be real.
-At that point in the battle, the background has too much color and detail. The other games just have pale shades.
-And the fact that it's legs look EXACTLY like a Crobat's under wings.
-It has too many knick-knacks and objects on it's skin, i.e. the rings to be real.
-At that point in the battle, the background has too much color and detail. The other games just have pale shades.
-And the fact that it's legs look EXACTLY like a Crobat's under wings.
CastformCloud said:Why am I SO unpopular here? It's like everyone else is right, and I'm wrong*sigh*
That's because you are extremely arrogant and full of yourself. You act if you had the King in your belly. I would like to say that is false, but, unfortunately, it's true.