I've done some research and I doubt Pika is town. He exhibits several signs of new mafia and while it is too numerous to list them all I seriously think he's scum. So...
##Vote: Pika
My notes:
Pika’s posts are few and far between. Here’s his posts from the first 30 pages.
Page 8: Voting with no reason.
Page 15: “Putting blame on Gekki for talking a lot.”
Page 21: All he did was change votes with no reason supplied yet again. Then…
Page 22: “I just feel like he’s not got much more to contribute and even if he is scum there is not a large enough amount of evidence against him.” Then said there was more evidence against him then the (very scummy) Goomy.
Did you see Pika's defense? What do you have to say about that?
AAAAH geez d2 was close
Sorry guys for the inactivity, I was on a vacation with no time to be on PokeBeach.
umm... I guess I will go read then.
Oh ok, I'll wait.
huh, that triplemo thing was weird.
Oh, so you almost finished reading, as the triplemo thing was near the end of D2. Good.
If you looked at my profile, i was gone for the entire week.
Proof that I was not on-purposley ignoring you
Does that mean you finished reading? Well? What do you think? any thoughts on some players? Something to contribute? Because as far as I see it, all you did was to post 3 posts to avoid being modkilled, after bbninjas tagged your name.
The TLS case was very weak.
Reason?
Gekki ignoring the game seems out of character.
Considering his explanation about having a lack of motivation to play, I
@Anime Psyclone You said you were going to make a case on Pika today. You did post some thoughts near the end of day 2, but are you planning on doing something in more detail today?
He was asked about it before D2 ended to give his case. He was pushed to give an answer today, and someone even noted to him that he could die by D3. He eventually posted his case, which was that exact streamline of thoughts that you referred to.
@Yog - tagging you because I saw you also waited for a wider case. Not gonna happen. No one really knows why Pika is scummy further than his one contradiction, which he already explained and no one would acknowledge. FoS on AP and Quaking who were really focused on him and were asked several times to give a real reason, but never answered properly.
Also, no important role, at least not something that relates to Pika.
So some players thought that AP might have some kind of investigating role and that is why he wanted to talk about Pika only after the night. Well, guess what, he was stalling again. Once some players pushed him to give the case, he gave it. Then he survived the night, which is weird, considering he just hinted to be an investigator, and then finally answered on D3 that he has nothing else to say about Pika. AP is one of the best leads in this game. This player is full of connections to other players which some defended and some accused.
@mirdo - I know it is your thing to collect data about activity, but you still need to share thoughts on active players. So far, D2 all you did for scumhunting was to say SamWise is aggressive to you, that you agree TE should be looked at, and the best one so far (in terms of your actual thoughts) that you agree about PMJ being weird. So what are your thoughts on the TE? That one I know you read because you responded to it. Do you think we should lynch TE, Samwise, or PMJ? because these are the only players you talked about, aside from those you told to pick their activity up. If these are not the best players to lynch today in your view, then who else should join to your list? or replace? That is all I want you to do, and your refusal to do so is weird to me.
Why won't you answer
@mirdo ?
