My point with all this is: it is perfectly possible to make a "set top list" before the set becomes legal, and what initially "triggered" me was that you started off by explaining why it was wrong to make an early top list then proceeded to post one yourself (and a top 25 at that, which is a bit too generous for any PTCG set) with some really questionable choices on it.
Did you read any of the posts between me and @FrostBiter12?
I said it was too early to try to rank how good Forbidden Light was as a set overall. As in, "Forbidden Light is the X best set of the Sun & Moon series." Which is how I read the title. Is that an utter failure of reading comprehension? I'll probably have an honest, accurate answer in a few days because I didn't even think of reading it any other way until I saw your most recent comment. It'll take a bit for me to finish processing. In my defense, even after almost 20 years, most people just call their Top 10 lists... Top 10 lists. XD
That's why I said I thought his thread title was misleading; because I (incorrectly) took it as "Set Ranking article" and not "Top 10 Cards of Forbidden Light". I then apologized for leading with it in my initial post because it was a minor thing, only worth mentioning because he stated he wants feedback for writing good articles.
I mean, maybe the guy thinks I'm the biggest jerk in the world, but then FrostBiter12 is being really patient and polite about it. XD
Edit: Regrettably, I felt the need to revise what I said. I skipped some "thoughts" as I moved from sentence to sentence, and even had some mundane typos to further muddy my message. In one or two places, I adjusted the tone. My apologies; even in a normal discussion, I try not to be so sloppy. In one that has become contentious, it is extra bad as it may appear I am trying to deceive by changing statements after the fact. >_< If you have your Notifications set up in a certain manner, the original post will have been preserved via the email notification sent to your Inbox.
Last edited: