Regarding Necromancy in COTD threads...

Magnevire

Aspiring Trainer
Member
Okay so at one point I briefly made a post in one of the topics, but I don't think anyone saw it, and in hindsight, I probably should have posted it here to begin with. Anyway, that's off topic, without further ado, I have a humble request to make of the PB Administration, and that is a more lenient enforcing of this rule in Pokemon COTDs provided that the COTD in question is a card that is still within the current modified format.

Now I know there is a big stigma against any sort of necromancy, and as someone who's been on a mod squad, I understand the concerns of reviving long dead threads with useless information. However, I think COTD is a little different insomuch that new sets and changes in the metagame can really lead to new discussions on previously listed cards. The viability of cards like Emboar, Zekrom, and Donphan changed with the release of Emerging Powers, and cards like Yanmega skyrocketed in value after nationals, even though the rotation of cards hadn't changed at all. Every TCG player knows the meta changes constantly, and as a result, a COTD topic from a month ago could still have relative data as the meta changes, sort of like a "second look" at the card due to changes in the metagame. I think it would be interesting to see how opinions have changed on certain cards as still more cards are released.

The other reason is a lot simpler, and that's the simple fact that there hasn't been a new COTD in a few months. While this reason is secondary, it is sad to see a really interesting metagame subforum just die due to the lack of a new thread and the regulations regarding "necro posts". Now I think I did read somewhere that posts would resume in time, and I don't doubt, but factoring the evolving metagame, and the fact there is little else to do, would making a few new replies based on new factors of the metagame really hurt all that much? I fully understand locking a thread for a card that isn't even legal because the information doesn't mean jack all, but it would be nice to revisit "legal" cards when a new set comes out, or when the meta abruptly changes.

That's about it really. I do politely ask if anyone replies, to please be cordial. I don't want a simple request to start any arguments.
 
I agree with you. If something is still relevant it can still be discussed as long as the thread doesn't stray off topic/turn into a flame war. We will definitely consider your request. Thanks for letting us know what you think. :)

BTW, COTD will be back soon!
 
First of all, I love your use of language, grammar, and spelling. Simply amazing.

I believe you present a valid point about Card of the Day, which in fact is going to come back soon. But, in this instance it would simply be better just to create a new thread about the card in question. If you have commentary about a certain card and want to inspire a discussion, just go ahead and make the thread. It's typically what happens when other threads that still have discussion value become to old; a new thread will pop up to replace it.

I like what you're saying, I hope this helps.

EDIT: Ninjaaaa'd.
 
I encourage these types of threads too. If you have something or a card you'd like to discuss, don't hesitate to make a thread. If it can lead to a good discussion, I welcome it.
 
Yeah, COTD is coming back soon.

I'm in agreement with your post, Magnevire. Very well-written, I might add.

If you or anyone else has any other suggestions they want to bring up, feel free to do so.
 
I'm glad the grammar is appreciated. What I'm doing could be considered a professional request though, so I may as well act professional, right?

The Fallen One said:
I believe you present a valid point about Card of the Day, which in fact is going to come back soon. But, in this instance it would simply be better just to create a new thread about the card in question. If you have commentary about a certain card and want to inspire a discussion, just go ahead and make the thread. It's typically what happens when other threads that still have discussion value become to old; a new thread will pop up to replace it.

Yeah, I remember having the same discussion with my old team when it came to the question of allowing revival of the old thread or simply have a new one created. I always thought fewer topics was easier for members to sift through, but a "then and now edition" could be cool as well, and I can see that making things less strenuous on you guys as well if there's ever a drought on good, new or interesting cards. I think simple revival is a bit more fluid insomuch that it can provide discussion in the event that there is a drought of interesting cards, but I can respect the other option.
 
Back
Top