Can do
Online or IRL?
When creating a thread in the Deck Garage, make sure that you post one deck per thread, you use the correct prefix, you have the set name/card number next to each card, you give a strategy for non-metagame decks, and give translations for all cards not available in English.
When posting in a thread, be sure to explain all your suggestions thoroughly. Additionally, do not ask for advice in another member's thread.
Can do
The fox is also standard, just saying.
I would maybe add more draw support, however I get what you are doing with volkner.
Pal pad is kinda useless because you have no need to shuffle supporters back into your deck, other than guzma.
I also think you should throw in that magneara stated somewhere above, because its pretty good to return your unnecessary tools into your hand and slap on a dumbells or something.
I think some Acerola could be good, because you can return a badly damaged sivally into your hand,and prevent them from getting the knockout.
Maybe one xurkitree could be good, just for stall against zoroark(not that you don't beat it anyway) or anything that runs DCE as the only energy. Also the GX attack is pretty good(bye bye, DCE).
If you have one, you could maybe put in a Lele, just so you can use sivally's attack and have something to sweep with later.
I find 5 electric energy to be a bit too little, maybe run a couple more.
Those are my thoughts (hope I didn't offend anyone)!
The whole thing with PMJ was an unnessecary two year old drama, that whatsoever should not have happened, but these in my humble opinion are good additions, personally I believe Lele isn't nessecary still, but.
Seriously somebody test this deck, I want to know (without) Lele if this is good.
Please do.Can do
The forum mod has spoken.Hey guys, I just wanted to remind everyone that the Deck Garage is designed so that all players can post and receive constructive feedback on their decks.
I get it that it's not always fun to play what everyone else thinks you should play. It's great to be creative when it comes to deckbuilding, and I love when people use new or discarded ideas to find a new strategy. I've even brought stuff as crazy as Dragonite-EX FFI to a National Championships before.
Yet, we need to keep in mind that others can have their thoughts about a deck as well. Even if what they think doesn't correspond with your ideas, they are still allowed to share their thoughts for others to read and evaluate.
Everyone should feel welcome to post their input on a deck - that's what allows it to grow, after all! Rejecting people's ideas and then shaming them won't get you any friends, and it certainly won't get your deck anywhere either. But if you insist on giving people flack about their deck ideas, you might want to try a rowdy Facebook group rather than a public forum.
Also, I noticed a large amount of posts that were completely unrelated to the topic at hand and have deleted them. Please limit your trade business and other non-deck-building-conversations to group messages.
If it was me playing this deck I would cut one or two BBD and add one or two ULP Magerna.
Yes I did. It was a small 4 match tournament. I won one...@Lord Goomy, did you go and test?
I didn't see any harsh in that.Did you take anyone's feedback into consideration and did any of the suggestions work for you? What did you lose to? What were your problems with the deck? What was the list you settled on, and what changes do you think you should make?
These are the kinds of conversations you need to have if you want to see improvement. Scrapping a list altogether after a tournament isn't how you progress within the competitive scene. This isn't me being harsh, this is me trying to be helpful.