Good luck to you as well.
As always, you may only submit one card per round to be judged.Congratulations everyone!
I have a question regarding round 2; is there a minimum or maximum on the amount of cards?
Thanks.
I get you, I misread the round 2 post since it says "you need to create cards" so I understood it as multiple cards each rather than cards as in one card each. That's okay though, I have prepared multiple but there's one main one. Thanks for the clarification!As always, you may only submit one card per round to be judged.
If, for some reason, you feel that the creation of additional cards would help contextualize your one entry, you may also create them, but keep in mind that still only one card will ultimately end up being the one that is judged.
@Kangaflora
Surskit - 60HP -
Basic
NO. 283 Pond Skater Pokémon HT: 1'08" WT: 3.7 lbs.
Dual Armor
If this Pokémon has anyEnergy attached to it, its type
is.
Quick Bubble - 10+
You may do 10 more damage. If you do, flip a coin. If tails,
this Pokémon does 10 damage to itself. If heads, your
opponent's Active Pokémon is now Paralyzed.
Weakness:x2
Resistance: ---
Retreat:
PokéDex Info: When this Pokémon senses danger, a sweet
fluid oozes from the top of its head. The taste of it disgusts
bird Pokémon.Wording:
-0.5 its should be it’s
-1 Incorrect order for heads/tails text. Heads should be first, Tails second.
-1 its type is should be it is [G] and [W] type.
No loss of points PokéDex should be Pokédex
12.5/15
Creativity/Originality:
There isn’t anything new going on here, all preexisting effects. Dual Armour is a cool ability that doesn’t show up very often, and while I am sure there could be some cool abilities or tools that take the dual typing, or the specific typing of this Pokémon, there is nothing inherently on the card that makes that ability useful. It would probably be better judged in a set as a part of a group, or synergy, with its evolution for example. Unfortunately there isn’t much here on its own.
9/20
Believability/Playability:
I don’t see anything that makes this less believable. Certainly looks weak, but that is fairly standard for small basic Pokémon.
15/15
Vracken Notes for Next Time
Unfortunately designing for small basics like this is hard. They rarely get cool effects, and the time they are cool, they are usually not impactful enough to justify losing a prize card for chip damage. Focus on something a little more unique, and you will significantly bump those points up.
Final Score: 36.5/50
this feels correct and i think it is a judging mistakeI have a question regarding judging of @Kangaflora 's card; in the "Wording" section, Kangaflora lost 0.5 points due with the reasoning "its should be it's", is this a Pokemon card wording rule or is it misjudged (I know it wouldn't make much differences in terms of score, but still)? According to grammatical rules of English, "its" is correct in this context as it is possessive, while "it's" with an apostrophe is only supposed to be used if it refers to a contraction such as "it is" or "it has", neither of which work in this card's context. I'm just wondering, since the card I am working on right now includes the word "its" in a similar context, and I want to know the clear ruling regarding "its" and "it's".
Thanks.
And you.
@Lord Goomy Unfortunately, unless the theme specifically asks for Trainers, we cannot accept any cards besides Pokémon. This is because it's close to impossible to judge the two types of cards by similar standards, which will end up making one side highly advantaged in the judging.And you.
Let’s have some fun, shall we?
You said we need to create cards that center around a Win condition that isn’t taking Prizes. Here, we’re putting Prizes!Reversion Fragment ♢ - Item
Trainer - ♢
♢ (Prism Star) Rule: You may only have 1 ♢ card with the same name in your deck. If a ♢ card would go to the discard pile, put it in the Lost Zone instead.
You may play this card only if you and your opponent have the same number of Prize Cards remaining.
Both players shuffle all of their Prize Cards into their deck. Instead of taking Prize Cards for Knocking Out a Pokémon, put a card from the top of your deck face-down as a Prize card for each Prize card you would’ve taken for Knocking Out that Pokémon. A player wins by having 5 Prize cards.
You may play as many Item cards as you like during your turn (before your attack).
And yes, the game ending at 5 Prize cards, rather than 6, is intentional.
Good luck to you all.
Ya know, I was wondering about that, whether you could submit a Trainer. You brought up the Lost World Stadium and I guess I got the impression I could submit a trainer myself. Oh well. Here goes again!@Lord Goomy Unfortunately, unless the theme specifically asks for Trainers, we cannot accept any cards besides Pokémon. This is because it's close to impossible to judge the two types of cards by similar standards, which will end up making one side highly advantaged in the judging.
Because of this, you'll need to submit a different card for this round in another post. Doing this won't count as an editing penalty.