I'm not sure why I'm answer question about a plot I think was messy to begin with, but here we going again:
Momaster12 said:
So just to get my facts straight, Paul McGann (Doctor #8) regenerated into the War Doctor, John Hurt. Which is why John Hurt isn't given a number (because he wasn't THE Doctor, he was the WAR Doctor)? Meaning that in the original series, Time Lords were still kicking and it was never referenced in this series that The Doctor destroyed the all of Time Lords? So then at the end of "The Day of The Doctor" he regenerates into Christopher Eccleston (Doctor #9/10 if counting John Hurt)? However, he lost his memories of these events so how could the timeline not be drastically altered? Wouldn't Eccleston now not have the memory of neither destroying nor saving Galifrey? Or would it be that John Hurt Doctor would return to his own timeline/universe/bubble thing? I'm so confused.
Also, who was at the end of "The Night of The Doctor?" The one in the reflection. I thought that that was supposed to be John Hurt.
1) Hurt isn't given a number because he doesn't call himself "The Doctor," lesser men lighting the flame and all that. He probably won't get a number even after his redemption (of sorts) because it would mean all the wiki pages have to be changed. But yes, Eccleston, while officially the Ninth Doctor, is technically the 10th incarnation.
2) Yup, there's quite a few older Doctor Who serials featuring Time Lords, and even a few which take place on Gallifrey. In fact, one of the Doctor's companions, Romana, was a Time Lady, and technically so was Susan (the Doctor's granddaughter), although the concept of "Time Lords" wasn't invented yet at the time. The Time Lords in the older Doctor Who serials probably don't remember the Time War because the Time War has apparently changed the future. It isn't the first time the future has been changed on Doctor Who.
3) I think the explanation for Eccleston thinking he activated the Moment even though he has no recollection of the event (memory and paradoxes in Doctor Who are messy subjects) is that it seems like the only logical conclusion. The Time War has ended and the Time Lords are gone, what else could have caused this?
4) The image shown at the end of "The Night of the Doctor" is in fact a younger John Hurt. Apparently he aged quite a bit during the events of the Time War. I personally think using a younger John Hurt was a bad idea, because the Doctor didn't age that much between his 7th and 9th incarnation, in fact, he apparently aged backwards by some 50 years. Even if his statement in "Time and the Rani" was a lie both himself and Romana put the fourth incarnation's age at around 750, which is only 150 years less than the ninth incarnation's 900. Eleven apparently didn't age a day in the 100 years he spent running away from his death, so even if the Doctor has barely aged between Five and Seven (which is equally ridiculous, because McCoy is quite clearly older in the movie), he still shouldn't look that much older. Let's not even mention McGann being quite a bit older as well. Either Moffat's admitting he messed up series 6 or he has no idea what consistency is. On top of this, considering the older Doctors tend to be grumpier, regenerating into an older form would've made more sense for the more serious "War Doctor."
There, I hope that answers your questions.