Finished Werewolf IV: Crash into Weird: Day 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you know what?
Unvote: PokeChamp
I don't know why, but I just don't think he's a wolf. He wasn't like this during the other game.
 
Obviously he just wants us to feel sorry for voting him off, imacharizard333.

I think he is a wolf, but no, I don't have any "solid" evidence aside from him acting all weird.
 
You know what? I think I overreacted there...
If I'm going down, then I'm at least going to stand my ground with my vote! It's time for me to man up!

Unvote: PokeChamp
Vote: Flare

Reason:
He's even worse than Rivallz. Rivallz posted in this thread, Flare did not. Flare's been watching this game too. He's very fishy. Plus, as stated by Mapleboy (?), the Great Pink Geek (possibly this game's alpha werewolf, I'm not too sure on it, yet) probably can't post in the actual thread. Now, what would the Great Pink Geek do? He'd have to read the thread, so he'd know what was going on. Check. He would not post in this thread, but instead, he would PM z-man. His messages probably don't come that often because they rely on z-man to be online to post them. The Great Pink Geek has advised us not to vote for the people that haven't posted. A mistake on his part, IMO. This is a useless ploy that in fact confirms my suspicions; The way I see it, Flare is fitting in perfectly with my suspicions!
 
Hello.

OK, I will now explain why I haven't been posting.

At the start of the day, I figured I would not have a reason to post, so I didn't. But as the day went on, and people started being suspicious of me, I convinced myself not to post, because at the time I figured it would make me seem like a wolf if I posted. But now, it's too risky to sit this one out. I don't want to get voted out, because I don't want the townspeople to use again. You'd just be voting off another helpful person.

P.S. I am NOT the Great Pink Geek.
 
^If your innocent, then why do you have to explain yourself? Hmm...

^I kind of agree with PokeChamp on this one, but seeing as Flare just posted, he's obviously not "The Great Pink Geek", so *bang* goes that theory, and any real evidence.
 
So really all we have is that pokechamp keeps accusing people and oyeah keeps posting random things. So unless we get some hard evidence i will not make anothers vote.
 
pythagoras said:
So really all we have is that pokechamp keeps accusing people and oyeah keeps posting random things. So unless we get some hard evidence I will not make anothers vote.

I'm sorry. But, I mean, I'm like that in real life. I'm very jumpy. Should I be punished for that? I really don't think so.

Also,

Unvote: Flare
Vote: Undecided


Sorry to accuse you there, Flare. Wow, one simple post ruined my theories in one strike :p
So... Pheonix hasn't posted yet...
Are we willing to vote him off?
 
PokeChamp said:
pythagoras said:
So really all we have is that pokechamp keeps accusing people and oyeah keeps posting random things. So unless we get some hard evidence I will not make anothers vote.

I'm sorry. But, I mean, I'm like that in real life. I'm very jumpy. Should I be punished for that? I really don't think so.

Also,

Unvote: Flare
Vote: Undecided


Sorry to accuse you there, Flare. Wow, one simple post ruined my theories in one strike :p
So... Pheonix hasn't posted yet...
Are we willing to vote him off?
You're forgiven. I can still see why you would've voted me off (before I posted, that is).

Hm.... I'm not sure. I've learned from past WW games we should just wait until someone makes a wrong move.
 
Flare said:
PokeChamp said:
pythagoras said:
So really all we have is that pokechamp keeps accusing people and oyeah keeps posting random things. So unless we get some hard evidence I will not make anothers vote.

I'm sorry. But, I mean, I'm like that in real life. I'm very jumpy. Should I be punished for that? I really don't think so.

Also,

Unvote: Flare
Vote: Undecided


Sorry to accuse you there, Flare. Wow, one simple post ruined my theories in one strike :p
So... Pheonix hasn't posted yet...
Are we willing to vote him off?
You're forgiven. I can still see why you would've voted me off (before I posted, that is).

Hm.... I'm not sure. I've learned from past WW games we should just wait until someone makes a wrong move.

Yeah. But, it can get awfully boring waiting for it :p
 
Devastator said:
Only person not to post at all has been dragonater2.

Well, this is the last possible suspect for being the GPG (according to my theory). I don't think it would be too bad of an idea to vote him off. Unless you guys are really against it, this is my final vote:

Vote: dragonater2
 
Mapleboy86 said:
Devastator said:
Only person not to post at all has been dragonater2.

Well, this is the last possible suspect for being the GPG (according to my theory). I don't think it would be too bad of an idea to vote him off. Unless you guys are really against it, this is my final vote:

Vote: dragonater2


I am against it. What proof do we have that the great pink geek is even a wolf. He could just be the great pink geek. voting for him seems kinda silly if thats the case and we are just sacrificing a person for a not very good reason. And it has occured to me that Phoenix could also be the great pink geek. don't know how i might have overlooked that earlier
 
Well from reading the first p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-page
I noticed either a mistake in Never Gonna Give You Up
Or PeRhApS SOME CLUE z-mAn Gave usss as to how many wolves there really are...
I quote:::
Give you up. give you up
Give you up, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, five you up
Did j00 notise the bolden werd in that song;;;

Methinks that there are a 707a1 of 5 wolves
 
Mapleboy86 said:
Well, what proof do we have that he isn't?

This is now the second time you have tried voting out the great pink geek. I really don't believe he is a wolf, though you seem fairly adamant to get rid of that particular character. There are a couple of people who I strongly think ARE NOT wolves and the great pink geek is 1 of them. What is the point of making a wolf not be able to post at all, it means that the other wolves would constantly have to protect that person which in this game all we have done is try to vote off inactive people. So that kinda blows that theory up as no one has really tried protecting dragonater2 or phoenix, only rivallz (who has now posted btw).

At this point in time, I think this day is NEVER going to end. NEVER. But there are 5 people who I now strongly believe are wolves. i am going to post them as well cause I think the wolves will kill me anyway tonight, if we ever get there.
Pokechamp - changed votes 5 times in 1 day. Also very suspicious and defensive of people for weird reasons
Flare - for reasons I already posted
Mapleboy - you and pokechamp have been trying to lead people astray together. Also tried to start a very unessecary failed bandwagon against Rivallz, when at that stage there were at least 6 others who had posted either once or not at all.
Pythagoras - doesn't post unless someone accuses him of being a wolf. Also was protected by pokechamp for very flimsy suspicious reasons
imacharizard333 - just been acting weird really weird. also been protected by others for really no reason.

I could be wrong. Completely wrong. But it seems to me that these 5 in particular are trying to influence everyone else into voting for anyone but them. Yeah Pokechamp voted for himself and maybe tried to bluff us, but notice how Flare posts when Pokechamp voted for him, not after my vote almost 4 pages ago. But it looks like to me from where I am that they could be working together. Who knows. Hopefully this will get some discussion going and we can get a wolf
 
oyeah1988 said:
Well from reading the first p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-page
I noticed either a mistake in Never Gonna Give You Up
Or PeRhApS SOME CLUE z-mAn Gave usss as to how many wolves there really are...
I quote:::
Give you up. give you up
Give you up, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, five you up
Did j00 notise the bolden werd in that song;;;

Methinks that there are a 707a1 of 5 wolves


Just noticed that... It's getting real board here
 
oyeah1988 said:
Well from reading the first p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-page
I noticed either a mistake in Never Gonna Give You Up
Or PeRhApS SOME CLUE z-mAn Gave usss as to how many wolves there really are...
I quote:::
Give you up. give you up
Give you up, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, five you up
Did j00 notise the bolden werd in that song;;;

Methinks that there are a 707a1 of 5 wolves

Now, let's think, what special value does the number five hold? Sure, it may be a total of wolves, but who is number five? Check the first page; It's WPM. I strongly believe WPM to be some kind of indy. The way z-man phrased his role, it was "powerful enough to win without even looking". I highly doubt that that kind of role is for the benefit of the townies. WPM is player #5. The page was last updated on the 5th month of 2009; May. Perhaps this change in the song was intentional, or, it was a typo. In any case, I advise the townies to look into it.
 
Devastator said:
Mapleboy86 said:
Well, what proof do we have that he isn't?

This is now the second time you have tried voting out the great pink geek. I really don't believe he is a wolf, though you seem fairly adamant to get rid of that particular character. There are a couple of people who I strongly think ARE NOT wolves and the great pink geek is 1 of them. What is the point of making a wolf not be able to post at all, it means that the other wolves would constantly have to protect that person which in this game all we have done is try to vote off inactive people. So that kinda blows that theory up as no one has really tried protecting dragonater2 or phoenix, only rivallz (who has now posted btw).

At this point in time, I think this day is NEVER going to end. NEVER. But there are 5 people who I now strongly believe are wolves. I am going to post them as well cause I think the wolves will kill me anyway tonight, if we ever get there.
Pokechamp - changed votes 5 times in 1 day. Also very suspicious and defensive of people for weird reasons
Flare - for reasons I already posted
Mapleboy - you and pokechamp have been trying to lead people astray together. Also tried to start a very unessecary failed bandwagon against Rivallz, when at that stage there were at least 6 others who had posted either once or not at all.
Pythagoras - doesn't post unless someone accuses him of being a wolf. Also was protected by pokechamp for very flimsy suspicious reasons
imacharizard333 - just been acting weird really weird. also been protected by others for really no reason.

I could be wrong. Completely wrong. But it seems to me that these 5 in particular are trying to influence everyone else into voting for anyone but them. Yeah Pokechamp voted for himself and maybe tried to bluff us, but notice how Flare posts when Pokechamp voted for him, not after my vote almost 4 pages ago. But it looks like to me from where I am that they could be working together. Who knows. Hopefully this will get some discussion going and we can get a wolf
Look @ devastator's post
In my opinion
Devastator could (now mind you, this is just a theory)
Sorta be wolfish
Remember my observation
What Ima thinkin
is the number 5
could be the key to solving this mystery
Notice how he had 5 people who he thought
was acting peculiar
And with Pokechamp,
accordianing to mah research, he switched votes
FIVE; Ya that's right
5 times in one day, as shown in Devastator's post
Now mind you, I am not casting my vote as I need to research this a little more.
But for now
UNVOTE:RIVALLZ
Vote: undecided
sorry for taking so long :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top