Finished Werewolf IV: Crash into Weird: Day 2

[Lenny]

And what if your random vote killed the Seer or the priest? Random voting is either extremely suspicious, or extremely dumb. Either way, you are too dangerous to be allowed life.

When I saw this post, it bothered the living heck out of me. Alright, it was day one. It's a given that a random vote would be given. You just wanted to end the day quickly, too. Nothing was suspicious about ESP at all. He wanted to end the day quickly, because seriously, you're not going to get a wolf on the first day. Nor is it likely to kill of the seer or priest day 1 either, but anything can happen. I'm just saying that his vote was completely justified. Nobody had reasons to vote for anybody. It was day 1.

Too dangerous to be allowed life? Do you realize that you said? That line right there got everybody to go along with your "idea". If anybody noticed, I didn't even vote for ESP. You were the one, PokeChamp, that jumped to conclusions more in my opinion. Although, I won't jump to conclusions, but I'm on your tail ;D

Vote: Undecided

Excellent points, actually. Random Voting, in my opinion, is dumb. Think about it, we could have killed the Seer, or the Priest. Who's to say pythagoras wasn't a priest/seer? I like to vote for people with at least some logic. ESP was trying to start a bandwagon, which, if you can recall, is supposed to a wolf technique. Although ESP wasn't the most suspicious character I've seen, he certainly wasn't spot-free in this department. In the end, though, I think it was a wise vote. His power did barely anything for the townies, except for an increased head count. In my opinion, he was one of the people we could actually do without. At least some of the other townies actually have roles that help us, instead of something that does nothing for the townies.

And yes, I got everyone to vote for ESP. But, think about it, he was probably the only townie that had a role that did nothing for the townies at all. Overall, I can't say I regret his loss, except for the fact that he's one less townie on our side.

@Mapleboy:
That's actually pretty accurate, considering the type of roles ESP gives out. I won't jump to conclusions either way, though. There's no evidence, so, there's no vote.

Alright, alright. How many games of WW have there been? Four. I don't think wolves will be using OBVIOUS wolf tactics. Everybody who has been a part of the WW games (at least 2) will know that. I've been a part of all four WW games and last game, I don't recall any of the wolves using bandwagon tactics (meaning random votes without evidence. If you have evidence, then it isn't a bandwagon, but ESP, even if he didn't know it, was starting a bandwagon). In my opinion, bandwagon is just an excuse to get someone lynched.

 

[imacharizard333]

Guys, Rivallz is on!

 

[Lenny]

Rivallz has been busy. I have talked to him on AIM, chill guys -_-'

 

[PokeChamp]

And what if your random vote killed the Seer or the priest? Random voting is either extremely suspicious, or extremely dumb. Either way, you are too dangerous to be allowed life.

When I saw this post, it bothered the living heck out of me. Alright, it was day one. It's a given that a random vote would be given. You just wanted to end the day quickly, too. Nothing was suspicious about ESP at all. He wanted to end the day quickly, because seriously, you're not going to get a wolf on the first day. Nor is it likely to kill of the seer or priest day 1 either, but anything can happen. I'm just saying that his vote was completely justified. Nobody had reasons to vote for anybody. It was day 1.

Too dangerous to be allowed life? Do you realize that you said? That line right there got everybody to go along with your "idea". If anybody noticed, I didn't even vote for ESP. You were the one, PokeChamp, that jumped to conclusions more in my opinion. Although, I won't jump to conclusions, but I'm on your tail ;D

Vote: Undecided

Excellent points, actually. Random Voting, in my opinion, is dumb. Think about it, we could have killed the Seer, or the Priest. Who's to say pythagoras wasn't a priest/seer? I like to vote for people with at least some logic. ESP was trying to start a bandwagon, which, if you can recall, is supposed to a wolf technique. Although ESP wasn't the most suspicious character I've seen, he certainly wasn't spot-free in this department. In the end, though, I think it was a wise vote. His power did barely anything for the townies, except for an increased head count. In my opinion, he was one of the people we could actually do without. At least some of the other townies actually have roles that help us, instead of something that does nothing for the townies.

And yes, I got everyone to vote for ESP. But, think about it, he was probably the only townie that had a role that did nothing for the townies at all. Overall, I can't say I regret his loss, except for the fact that he's one less townie on our side.

@Mapleboy:
That's actually pretty accurate, considering the type of roles ESP gives out. I won't jump to conclusions either way, though. There's no evidence, so, there's no vote.

Alright, alright. How many games of WW have there been? Four. I don't think wolves will be using OBVIOUS wolf tactics. Everybody who has been a part of the WW games (at least 2) will know that. I've been a part of all four WW games and last game, I don't recall any of the wolves using bandwagon tactics (meaning random votes without evidence. If you have evidence, then it isn't a bandwagon, but ESP, even if he didn't know it, was starting a bandwagon). In my opinion, bandwagon is just an excuse to get someone lynched.

Well, just because they aren't expected to use wolf techniques, doesn't mean they won't. I will admit, though, that we could have been less hasty on the subject of ESP's doom. (my vote included).

 

[Mapleboy86]

This game is going to get going to get nowhere fast. Obviously, if someone hasn't made a mistake yet, no one is going to today. We should consider getting rid of one of the previously mentioned. Rivallz is the person I am the most concerned about.

 

[PokeChamp]

WPM has a god role, apparently. But, Rivallz hasn't been posting. He's been on, but refuses to post. It's getting awfully hard not to vote for him...

 

[Mapleboy86]

We have the power to lynch him, b/c if 3-4 of us vote, sadly, the rest will follow suit and we will have gotten rid of a powerful player. If you guys agree with me, i'll place the 1st vote.

 

[PokeChamp]

We have the power to lynch him, because if 3-4 of us vote, sadly, the rest will follow suit and we will have gotten rid of a powerful player. If you guys agree with me, I'll place the 1st vote.

Will they? I mean, I'm good with that and all, but I'm not sure if the players of this game are as flexible as you seem to think of them. I'll probably have to go through with this, although I don't like the idea of a random vote. But, we don't have much choice. If you want to, you may be the first voter.

 

[Mapleboy86]

Ok, with PC and my above statements:

Unvote: Undecided
Vote: Rivallz

 

[imacharizard333]

Unvote: Undecided
Vote: Rivallz
I don't want to do this, but it's for our own good.

 

[PokeChamp]

Eh, I really don't want to lynch you, Rivallz, but there just isn't any other option. Goes against everything I know, but...

Unvote: Undecided
Vote: Rivallz

 

[Brawler]

Why not WPM? I'm sure he's been on, but I haven't seen him post recently.

 

[imacharizard333]

Why not WPM? I'm sure he's been on, but I haven't seen him post recently.

He's the Administrator of the website. He's busy. He doesn't have the time to pay attention to a game where we destroy our minds with false logic.
Go ahead and vote for him. You probably won't kill anything good when we could have killed a wolf.

 

[MetaNite]

I don't know if I should vote for Rivallz...
Alright, I will, because
1) He probably saw the thread, and decided not to post
2) He posted a lot in the other game

I kinda don't want to do this, but we're getting nowhere.
Vote: Rivallz

 

[Amt]

I don't think we should vote off Rivallz.

PokeChamp likes to jump on people that hardly post (a strategy he used last werewolf game, where he was a wolf). For all we know, Rivallz could have a role dependent on someone else posting.

Being inactive in a game doesn't mean you're a wolf. You could be, but it doesn't mean you are. I think if we all keep listening to PokeChamp, we are going to have a tough time winning.

Vote: PokeChamp

 

[Mapleboy86]

I don't see why you are jumping on PC as I am the one who started the vote. If Rivallz ends up being a wolf, I think you're next Amt

 

[Amt]

If you guys agree with me, I'll place the 1st vote.

If you want to, you may be the first voter.

You didn't vote for him just because you wanted to. You only voted FIRST because someone agreed.

 

[Mapleboy86]

This game is going to get going to get nowhere fast. Obviously, if someone hasn't made a mistake yet, no one is going to today. We should consider getting rid of one of the previously mentioned. Rivallz is the person I am the most concerned about.

We have the power to lynch him, because if 3-4 of us vote, sadly, the rest will follow suit and we will have gotten rid of a powerful player. If you guys agree with me, I'll place the 1st vote.

Hey, I didn't want to get lynched for "bandwagoning," you can never be too careful.

 

[Amt]

You still didn't bring Rivallz up first, though. PokeChamp did. Being inactive doesn't mean you're a wolf. He very well could be, though.

I think the logical choice would be voting for PokeChamp, though. I think he is using the same strategy he did last game: Vote off the inactives, be very active and try to act like a 'leader'.

 

[Mapleboy86]

Still, voting PC was unnecessary. We are just trying to get this game moving. I can't wait to see what Rivallz is, so we can see who to go for next. Or, we could get rid of you now, if you prefer.