Finished Werewolf XX: Seleno City

Status
Not open for further replies.
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Camoclone said:
Keeper of Night said:
Usually, wolves have a vote too. js
So? I don't see your point.

You're making it sound as if Fletch giving up his vote means he doesn't have a vote. In turn, he must be scum.

And be did vote, so I don't see why you think he have up his vote at all.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Hmmm...
I think I'll stick with my vote for now.
Palutena may be indie, after all. Or I'm a noob.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Keeper of Night said:
Camoclone said:
So? I don't see your point.

You're making it sound as if Fletch giving up his vote means he doesn't have a vote. In turn, he must be scum.

And be did vote, so I don't see why you think he have up his vote at all.
No... Have you read my posts? By giving up his vote he means that he will back down with little pressure and didn't have a case. Mindlessly bandwagoning and OMGUS'ing isn't what town aligned noobs do.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Camoclone said:
Keeper of Night said:
You're making it sound as if Fletch giving up his vote means he doesn't have a vote. In turn, he must be scum.

And be did vote, so I don't see why you think he have up his vote at all.
No... Have you read my posts? By giving up his vote he means that he will back down with little pressure and didn't have a case. Mindlessly bandwagoning and OMGUS'ing isn't what town aligned noobs do.

I did read your posts, specifically this one:
It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?

He's using his vote incorrectly, but he hasn't given it up.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Keeper of Night said:
Camoclone said:
No... Have you read my posts? By giving up his vote he means that he will back down with little pressure and didn't have a case. Mindlessly bandwagoning and OMGUS'ing isn't what town aligned noobs do.

I did read your posts, specifically this one:
It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?

He's using his vote incorrectly, but he hasn't given it up.
I was referring to LF "giving up" when I voted for him.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

...How did I give up? I am Dread Lord Fletchling, you should Praise Me. >:3
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Cleverer have anything to add? (Since you come from other sites and want to change this meta)
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Camoclone said:
Reinforce said:
... WHAT.

That's NOT how you make a conclusion.
It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?

Because it's just 1 single vote that isn't convincing anybody else to do the same.

Camoclone said:
Also my vote is legit because he is scum.

And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Reinforce said:
Camoclone said:
It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?

Because it's just 1 single vote that isn't convincing anybody else to do the same.
Correct... That's why it is so scummy.
Camoclone said:
Also my vote is legit because he is scum.
RVS much? We have been over this
And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
Wrong... Do I need to babysit you guys and spell out my cases or can you guys take your reasoning to a higher level? Some of you are perfectly capable while others I have my doubts.
Bolded responses.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Reinforce said:
And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
My conclusions are fine... You shouldn't agree with what I say based off anything but what you think. If you think a person I'm attacking is scum then why not vote for them? I just don't get this post the more I think about it.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

I could bet my PC that I'd see Camoclone attack.
Do we need to go through this again, Camo? Yeah, if you have a case, please babysit us and undertake the difficult task of explaining it to us poor noobs and/or idiots, since obviously our reasoning is so low we can't understand yours even if it became a hammer and hit us.

Right now, I can't be sure about anything. I have some ideas, but they aren't fully formed yet. I'll be back with more later.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Chaos Jackal said:
I could bet my PC that I'd see Camoclone attack.
Do we need to go through this again, Camo? Yeah, if you have a case, please babysit us and undertake the difficult task of explaining it to us poor noobs and/or idiots, since obviously our reasoning is so low we can't understand yours even if it became a hammer and hit us.

Right now, I can't be sure about anything. I have some ideas, but they aren't fully formed yet. I'll be back with more later.
That's not what I said nor what I want to do.
 
Re: RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Camoclone said:
Reinforce said:
Because it's just 1 single vote that isn't convincing anybody else to do the same.
Correct... That's why it is so scummy.
RVS much? We have been over this
And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
Wrong... Do I need to babysit you guys and spell out my cases or can you guys take your reasoning to a higher level? Some of you are perfectly capable while others I have my doubts.
Bolded responses.
Oh look, you even bolded where you actually said that.
That's cute.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Camoclone said:
Reinforce said:
And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
My conclusions are fine... You shouldn't agree with what I say based off anything but what you think. If you think a person I'm attacking is scum then why not vote for them? I just don't get this post the more I think about it.

You say that yet when someone says they don't agree or think that the person you're pointing out is scum too, you either call them scum or a scum buddy or that they're not just seeing your point or your case --- Are we not allowed to think that you're wrong and thus not jump to agree with you when you say someone is scum. If we really are allowed to think on our own and don't have to agree with everything you say, then don't act so scandalized when somebody actually does say they don't.

Not agreeing with you does not mean we didn't understand your case or your point. We did or we might have, but we just don't agree. Why, yes, that's a possibility.

Anyway, from what everybody else has been saying, what I'm doing right now is moot, so w/e.

Reminder that I'll be voting for Professor Palutena if nothing more interesting comes up.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

I usually don't agree with camoclone, but I do today. I've always been a fan of RVS and have done it many times over the course of playing the game. And while James questions RVS and that is most certainly suspicious I stem the reason more for that more because PB doesn't support RVS all that often rather than he's scum. However, James' action after the camoclone vote have made me more suspicious of James, and if it weren't camoclone and James fighting (As it always is), I'd probably vote WanderingWolf right now.
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Reinforce said:
Camoclone said:
My conclusions are fine... You shouldn't agree with what I say based off anything but what you think. If you think a person I'm attacking is scum then why not vote for them? I just don't get this post the more I think about it.

You say that yet when someone says they don't agree or think that the person you're pointing out is scum too, you either call them scum or a scum buddy or that they're not just seeing your point or your case --- Are we not allowed to think that you're wrong and thus not jump to agree with you when you say someone is scum. If we really are allowed to think on our own and don't have to agree with everything you say, then don't act so scandalized when somebody actually does say they don't.
I point it out when they do it scummily. You are perfectly fine disagreeing with me as long as you don't do it in a scummy way.

Not agreeing with you does not mean we didn't understand your case or your point. We did or we might have, but we just don't agree. Why, yes, that's a possibility.
Constantly asking for cases bothers me.

Anyway, from what everybody else has been saying, what I'm doing right now is moot, so w/e.


Reminder that I'll be voting for Professor Palutena if nothing more interesting comes up.
No problem with that but I want to point out to everyone that he said he is bulletproof. There is no reason for scum or town to claim that unless they truly are. Indies who have to be lynched always have some thing that can kill them. Now I'm thinking about the flavor and I've decided that a bird wouldn't really be scum or town aligned however they would be an indie. If I had to guess I would think that Birdy can only be lynched on even days or something like that.
Boded responses...
 
RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST

Chaos Jackal said:
I could bet my PC that I'd see Camoclone attack.
Do we need to go through this again, Camo? Yeah, if you have a case, please babysit us and undertake the difficult task of explaining it to us poor noobs and/or idiots, since obviously our reasoning is so low we can't understand yours even if it became a hammer and hit us.

Right now, I can't be sure about anything. I have some ideas, but they aren't fully formed yet. I'll be back with more later.
Very different connotations and not what I meant at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top