RE: Werewolf XX: Seleno City - Day 1 ends Jan 10 at 4 PM EST
Usually, wolves have a vote too. js
Usually, wolves have a vote too. js
So? I don't see your point.Keeper of Night said:Usually, wolves have a vote too. js
Camoclone said:So? I don't see your point.Keeper of Night said:Usually, wolves have a vote too. js
No... Have you read my posts? By giving up his vote he means that he will back down with little pressure and didn't have a case. Mindlessly bandwagoning and OMGUS'ing isn't what town aligned noobs do.Keeper of Night said:Camoclone said:So? I don't see your point.
You're making it sound as if Fletch giving up his vote means he doesn't have a vote. In turn, he must be scum.
And be did vote, so I don't see why you think he have up his vote at all.
Camoclone said:No... Have you read my posts? By giving up his vote he means that he will back down with little pressure and didn't have a case. Mindlessly bandwagoning and OMGUS'ing isn't what town aligned noobs do.Keeper of Night said:You're making it sound as if Fletch giving up his vote means he doesn't have a vote. In turn, he must be scum.
And be did vote, so I don't see why you think he have up his vote at all.
It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?
I was referring to LF "giving up" when I voted for him.Keeper of Night said:Camoclone said:No... Have you read my posts? By giving up his vote he means that he will back down with little pressure and didn't have a case. Mindlessly bandwagoning and OMGUS'ing isn't what town aligned noobs do.
I did read your posts, specifically this one:
It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?
He's using his vote incorrectly, but he hasn't given it up.
Camoclone said:It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?Reinforce said:... WHAT.
That's NOT how you make a conclusion.
Camoclone said:Also my vote is legit because he is scum.
Bolded responses.Reinforce said:Camoclone said:It kind of is... Why would a town aligned member give up when they have 1 vote?
Because it's just 1 single vote that isn't convincing anybody else to do the same.
Correct... That's why it is so scummy.
RVS much? We have been over thisCamoclone said:Also my vote is legit because he is scum.
And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
Wrong... Do I need to babysit you guys and spell out my cases or can you guys take your reasoning to a higher level? Some of you are perfectly capable while others I have my doubts.
My conclusions are fine... You shouldn't agree with what I say based off anything but what you think. If you think a person I'm attacking is scum then why not vote for them? I just don't get this post the more I think about it.Reinforce said:And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
That's not what I said nor what I want to do.Chaos Jackal said:I could bet my PC that I'd see Camoclone attack.
Do we need to go through this again, Camo? Yeah, if you have a case, please babysit us and undertake the difficult task of explaining it to us poor noobs and/or idiots, since obviously our reasoning is so low we can't understand yours even if it became a hammer and hit us.
Right now, I can't be sure about anything. I have some ideas, but they aren't fully formed yet. I'll be back with more later.
Oh look, you even bolded where you actually said that.Camoclone said:Bolded responses.Reinforce said:Because it's just 1 single vote that isn't convincing anybody else to do the same.
Correct... That's why it is so scummy.
RVS much? We have been over this
And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
Wrong... Do I need to babysit you guys and spell out my cases or can you guys take your reasoning to a higher level? Some of you are perfectly capable while others I have my doubts.
Read please... I never said that.Haunted Water said:Oh look, you even bolded where you actually said that.Camoclone said:Bolded responses.
That's cute.
Camoclone said:My conclusions are fine... You shouldn't agree with what I say based off anything but what you think. If you think a person I'm attacking is scum then why not vote for them? I just don't get this post the more I think about it.Reinforce said:And that's a fact now? And no, quoting me your post about your case on Lord Fletchling is not going to work as "solid evidence" either when, as Keeper of Night pointed out, you do it to nearly everybody else nearly every time they speak up. It's making your "conclusions" look more like random, not well-thought-out guesses than anything. And that's what makes it so hard for me to take you seriously, or agree with what you say.
Boded responses...Reinforce said:Camoclone said:My conclusions are fine... You shouldn't agree with what I say based off anything but what you think. If you think a person I'm attacking is scum then why not vote for them? I just don't get this post the more I think about it.
You say that yet when someone says they don't agree or think that the person you're pointing out is scum too, you either call them scum or a scum buddy or that they're not just seeing your point or your case --- Are we not allowed to think that you're wrong and thus not jump to agree with you when you say someone is scum. If we really are allowed to think on our own and don't have to agree with everything you say, then don't act so scandalized when somebody actually does say they don't.
I point it out when they do it scummily. You are perfectly fine disagreeing with me as long as you don't do it in a scummy way.
Not agreeing with you does not mean we didn't understand your case or your point. We did or we might have, but we just don't agree. Why, yes, that's a possibility.
Constantly asking for cases bothers me.
Anyway, from what everybody else has been saying, what I'm doing right now is moot, so w/e.
Reminder that I'll be voting for Professor Palutena if nothing more interesting comes up.
No problem with that but I want to point out to everyone that he said he is bulletproof. There is no reason for scum or town to claim that unless they truly are. Indies who have to be lynched always have some thing that can kill them. Now I'm thinking about the flavor and I've decided that a bird wouldn't really be scum or town aligned however they would be an indie. If I had to guess I would think that Birdy can only be lynched on even days or something like that.
Very different connotations and not what I meant at all.Chaos Jackal said:I could bet my PC that I'd see Camoclone attack.
Do we need to go through this again, Camo? Yeah, if you have a case, please babysit us and undertake the difficult task of explaining it to us poor noobs and/or idiots, since obviously our reasoning is so low we can't understand yours even if it became a hammer and hit us.
Right now, I can't be sure about anything. I have some ideas, but they aren't fully formed yet. I'll be back with more later.