Not tunnelling; I've shared thoughts on the two cases we've got plenty. I don't think either of them are scum.For one thing, that's not at all true.
For another, that wasn't defending Camo, that's asking for a case.
All Celever is doing is tunneling. He's ignoring the two cases presented, trying to push suspicion on another player without reason.
For one thing, that's not at all true.
For another, that wasn't defending Camo, that's asking for a case.
All Celever is doing is tunneling. He's ignoring the two cases presented, trying to push suspicion on another player without reason.
No, the ability raises evasion when confused. None of the other Pokemon with the ability stumble around.
So you go straight from bandwagoning, to OMGUS, to bandwagoning again?
No, I don't like it.
Reminds me of somebody else.
There's little to explain about that, I don't get your problem with it.
For those that didn't immediately get it (Jabber, Celever), Camo is basically claiming Spinda. It may be a safe-claim, it may not be, but Spinda himself is part of the town and that is what is towny about the ability.
There's little reason to see SS, over everybody else in the game, as scummy. And I really haven't noticed him being any quieter than usual. Like Luis said, you're reaching pretty far for this one.
I never said he was town. Jabber simply asked why Camo never explained what was towny about it. But like Camo said, there is nothing to explain. Jabber is trying to trying to make his reads off literally nothing (save his bandwagon on TFP).
If anything, it's just humorous when the two he tries to flip between get desperate and start arguing why the other should be the one lynched.
Why? You never did explain what happened to make you think that.
The only thing we have for him is that he's immune to abilities, and he already explained that much.
If I do that, I will be called out on bandwagon. Not a viable option.Anyone not picking a side at this point of time is scummy. Pick a side now please.
LIES!@CeleverPlus he is pressuring me so much I don't think I can contribute.
I'm not sure about others, but I find a scummy bandwagon when someone fails to give good reasoning on why they voted for the player. Please vote, or at the very least tell us your reads. Atm you aren't contributing anything.If I do that, I will be called out on bandwagon. Not a viable option.
[he's mocking Celever here]LIES!
I was pressuring you more on day 2 than Celever is now, and all you did was give snarky retorts and try to continue the argument when I said that I was done. I'm still not completely over that ability of yours, either.
Well, really the only one is Camo because the second focus shifted to him, he turned into a snarky butt who spent his time being sarcastic and annoying.Please vote, or at the very least tell us your reads.
I don't think so, but state them again, please, because now I want to hear it. Feel free to add that piece of evidence that you got last night that you keep avoiding too.I've given plenty of reasoning for the lynch on Camo.
And... Do I need to defend against that?You're dodging scattered's point. [He says] you were only responding to things about Camo, and not things about others players.
...I don't understand.Ah, okay, Jabberwock/TFP/others getting lynched does not concern you. You are only concerned about Camo getting lynched. Gotcha.