Calls out Jesi for dumbtelling
You're misinterpreting "pointing out" as calling out. If I were calling her out, I would have placed a vote. I was helping her play, not trying to force a case out of nothing.
Tells us we need to be suspicious of new players
Never have I done this, at least since becoming a mod and getting a better perspective of the state of the site. New players are our future, we need to help them get into the game wherever we can -- not lynch them.
Criticizes EM for talking about anime
Nono, criticises EM for making exclusively posts about fluff. I can't be any more clear with this lol.
Votes TGK for backpedaling (Forgets ##)
Revotes TGK
You're making it seem like tunnelling. "Revoting" never occurred; I only voted for him once, I just screwed up the formatting when doing so.
Asks bb why he put future reference on Celevers faulty vote
Asks again
More pressure on bb
Votes bb for not explaining the future reference
Tells bb to stop hiding stuff
bb needs to be lynched
Defends his case on bb
His case on bb isn't role fish
Says it's very unlikely that bb's role has anything to do with why he doesn't want to explain the future reference
There is no townie reason for bb to post something somewhat obscure without providing reasoning
More about bb needing to post his thougths
bb should share all his reasoning with the town
Doesn't know bb's alignment for sure
Yes, I have made a lot of posts about bb. This is calls pressure, and I do it every game. So does Camo. It's pretty much our jobs on this site early on in the game. I attack more experienced players, he tries to force lynches on new players. It's fine if you've got a problem with my playstyle, but that doesn't make me scum, and my playstyle is a hell of a lot better than Camo's for the future of this site. Tunnelling isn't always bad, and these points were all made throughout the rest of this list with plenty of posts on other players inbetween. Therefore, it's not really even tunnelling -- it's just keeping on a great deal of pressure. This isn't scummy, this is trying to find a slip or make a player crack, which is the only way town ever gets results and is the foundation of all of our future cases.
There are probably scum on TGK's wagon
Wants to know why everyone's voting TGK
Don't you agree with this? I mean, this was the topic of the first couple posts on Day 2. Wanting people to post reasoning for their votes is definitely a good thing. :U
Calls out people for random votes after RVS
Again, this is good. Generally in a case you only include the bad stuff, because especially when you don't have conclusions, it's hard to know what you think is meant to be scummy.
Is getting bad vibes from Robin and TGK
Major defense of Robin when TGK votes him (Right after saying he got bad vibes from Robin)
First of all, I cut a few generic and un-noteworthy posts between these, so it's not as sudden as it appears. But anyway, I wasn't defending Robin -- I was being critical of TGK's case. There's a different. "Vibes" can't be personified, whereas TGK took those vibes of the general thread and tried to materialise a forced lynch on him. IIRC, Robin wasn't guilty of most of TGK's case, and what he did do was pure speculation. As such, I attacked the case. A by-product of this is hypothetically also defending Robin, but only if you're reaching.
Tells Robin to ignore Camo
Camo's tactics push lynches, not scum lynches
Mentions why he's not arguing with Camo
Camo's case on him is only speculation
Never interacted with Camo last game thanks to dimensions (They were in the same one)
Accuses Camo for pushing blame onto him
This happens every game. Camo denies all responsibility for any arguments that occur between us, which is impossible when there are two sides and I usually try to avoid them wherever possible as it's incredibly distracting. I had a memory lapse on us being in the same dimension Day 1 last game (because he never talked) but that's not a scumtell so much as me just being derpy. I also always tell new players to ignore Camo's tunnelling on them because, as is quoted there, Camo's tactics push lynches -- not necessarily scum lynches. Sometimes those two things just coincide.
Personally I don't recall saying that Camo's case on me is only speculation, because he never actually posted a case.
Camo is scum for not being scum recently (Camo was scum more recently than Celever)
This is terrible logic which I would never use. You're misconstruing the posts again.
We need to go easy on new players (Robin)
Yup.
Anything can be turned into a scumtell by an experienced player
Yup.
Votes TGK after his claim, since we have nothing to lose
Yup.
Tunneling isn't scummy early day 1
Yup.
Asks Xerneas for thoughts
His post (To Xerneas) was just fluff, don't read into it
The first post here was made as soon as he subbed into the game. Obviously it was just some really bad humour.
Asks TGK if his mason partners are definitely town
We get confos for lynching TGK
Asks TGK for a role claim
Says that he should have sense to cut unmentioned abilities out of his claim after Camo says TGK shouldn't fully claim
Posting full reads is too early
Yup.
Thinks bb is exaggerating what Celever said about players posting reads when asked
And do you not?
Admits that he was exaggerating himself
This is the art of pressuring. I wasn't exaggerating to a major degree, but for example just using "you are" instead of "you could be" raises the amount of pressure and is slight hyperbole.
Players have every right to not answer any possible role fish (Which as Celever has been so certain about, isn't the case with bb)
bb's posts aren't relevant when he's exaggerating
I don't think I used the word relevant so much as noteworthy. If bb is trying to prove a point through childish exaggeration, it's not worth giving them attention. His "defense" was just taking what I said to him and being ridiculously stupid with trying to turn that case back around. In other words, he never did defend himself.
Shouldn't need to post disclaimers
Only scum read posts in absolutes
Both true.
Says he's been sharing thoughts on all players
I don't think I said all so much as "a wide variety" of players, which as we can see from this post is very true.
We pretty much know we're lynching TGK
Tells EM to contribute
Some defense of EM
Disagrees with TGK's case on EM, he should make a better case or focus on someone else
Defending EM
Tells EM to contribute again
This is the second time you said I defended EM, but I cut where you said I "mildly defended" him earlier. I'm not sure I know what you're talking about. I've been complimentary of his play last game, but not this time around since it's all been fluff. The amount of "defends" and "attacks" you've got me doing to EM throughout this post means that one of them is wrong or I'm behaving incredibly erratically. I'm gonna go for the former, and that's referring to the defending aspect.
Asks TGK for thoughts on Jabber
Dismisses those thoughts
Again, sounds way worse than it is! His case was incredibly speculatory and had more reaches. I disregarded it because he was again trying his hardest to push a bad lynch.
Jesi's post sounds coached
Tells Robin not to lurk. Asks who he wants to vote
Asks who he doesn't want to vote
Says he doesn't care who Robin wants to vote
Asks morda if he can post something of more content
Doesn't care if he gets stuff wrong
Speculates about TGK's ability
TGK is the best lynch
Otherwise lynch EM for not posting
Suggests that Maya claims Pearl
Asks bb what he means with the masons claiming
Asks Jesi why she wants to post fluff
Says he's scum
Says above post was sarcasm after I vote him
Says he needed to clarify as he thought I was confused
Camo is bluffing about this being off
Agrees with Jabber that I seem scummy. Says he was waiting for someone else to point it out
Votes me thinking I want to lynch SS
Realizes I was talking about Jabber
Asks me for a case on him
Thinks TGK is town