Finished Werewolf XXXIII: Order in the Court!- Congratulations Law!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love how you decide to vote me purely for lurking when like half the players do that. Drac robin reinforce skyleaf etc.
 
The only reason for pressuring me is some obscure interaction with EM
Thing is, EM was mainly posting excuses and Camo was defending him to an extent. It just so happens that you've subbed in for him, and that's why the people who have voted for you have done so. You're in the shoes of the one who's actually technically being suspected.

I don't bother posting on my phone because it's annoying and I can't go back and look at things etc.
You do know there's such a thing as draft messages, right? I've made a bunch of posts from mobile––heck, I've even updated Return of the Interspectaculars from mobile––which is a pain in the butt because of formatting my chapters.

my own team NK'd me night 1
So scum can kill their own in the night? What purpose would that even serve?
 
Reasons why I am scum (i'm not really ofc, just for arguments sake)
- random obscure musing from bb (boi u know ur case has nothing)
- blamed for interactions with camo and EM (who I subbed for, doesn't really apply to me much especially bc camo likes going after new players. saying EM/me is scum because of that is so random and shot in the dark its not even funny)
- lurking was busy not my fault

everyone voting me is bandwagoning for no real reason.

Reasons why KX is scum
- was inactive and posted nothing of substance, was very inactive, until he gets put on the spot and his scum buddies tell him to post of course
- doesn't even provide defense, just says that he's VT and doesn't care if he dies
- contradicts this by claiming wiretapper and saying he's dangerous to scum
- weak claim
- everything else valid that was in the cases made against him way back when
- very scummy and bandwagony

@Robin Aisaga they didn't know I was on their team it was weird but I had such an OP role lol, camo as wolf read me as a PR and NK'd me it was the worst
 
Also usually when checking from phone i don't have time to read everything and make actual thought out posts. Apparently that makes me scum. What I don't get is why scattered voted me. Guess he could easily be scum bandwagoning to save KX, if KX is lynched when he flips scum I'm going after scattered
 
lol. this case is even worse than celever's. The only reason for pressuring me is some obscure interaction with EM, who I'm subbed in for.
The only reasoning on ME is lurking. I've been busy, I have only been able to check the thread every now and then on my phone since whenever the last time I posted was. I don't bother posting on my phone because it's annoying and I can't go back and look at things etc. They wouldn't be good posts at all. The wagon is so stupid. bb makes some weak case and the others who have voted me are simply bandwagoning and ofc KX wants to save his own skin.

Using a phone isn't the best excuse to avoid posting.... I play all WW games here on my mobile, and all my posts are from my mobile.. This is hardly an excuse..

And yeah, there are certainly elements of you that are scummy.. EM and camos interactions are what (in my eyes) make you truly scummy, but you yourself haven't provided much this game.

Camo will often attack his own scum partners. His interactions with EM are borderline buddying, defending and also attacking, something he does to his scum partners.
 
Not sure about anyone else here, but I'm pretty confident KX is town. I've never played a game like this before, but I feel like he's worried because he has a role that seems very safeclaim-ish but isn't.

@Robin Aisaga they didn't... (cont.)
Why are you tagging Robin? Unless Robin asked the same thing and I missed it, I'm pretty sure my name reads PikaMasterJesi... (Went back and checked, and there's nothing from him/her on that.)

Using a phone isn't the best excuse to avoid posting.... I play all WW games here on my mobile, and all my posts are from my mobile.. This is hardly an excuse..
Thanks for proving my point, SS.

Go have some epic music:
All these animation urges when I'm crap at animating... why... Well, there's only one solution. 3 FPS GO GO GO!
 
Reasons why I am scum (i'm not really ofc, just for arguments sake)
- random obscure musing from bb (boi u know ur case has nothing)
- blamed for interactions with camo and EM (who I subbed for, doesn't really apply to me much especially bc camo likes going after new players. saying EM/me is scum because of that is so random and shot in the dark its not even funny)
- lurking was busy not my fault

everyone voting me is bandwagoning for no real reason.

Reasons why KX is scum
- was inactive and posted nothing of substance, was very inactive, until he gets put on the spot and his scum buddies tell him to post of course
- doesn't even provide defense, just says that he's VT and doesn't care if he dies
- contradicts this by claiming wiretapper and saying he's dangerous to scum
- weak claim
- everything else valid that was in the cases made against him way back when
- very scummy and bandwagony

@Robin Aisaga they didn't know I was on their team it was weird but I had such an OP role lol, camo as wolf read me as a PR and NK'd me it was the worst

By saying I'm scummy by being inactive that also calls every other person who isn't very active scummy too. I was subbed in around the time of finals week which makes my ability to participate next to none, but my summer break started this week which luckily for me allows me more time to defend myself against Celever's case. And the only "bandwagon" I hopped on was yours (and technically Camo's but he was confoscum so why wouldn't I vote for him). I brought up a point of you going right after me the second suspicion was raised about me. I already made many posts describing my "want to die" and at this point the only thing scummy about me is a safe-claimy role. And before someone else brings up Celever's case on the list (which is the only thing of substance in his case) it falls flat based on the fact that PP made no connection of him being Pearl Fey, or being connected to TGK, or anything. People were thinking Wendy Oldbag was the safeclaim and we still don't know if Pearl was the only safeclaim on that list. Scum got lucky by NK'ing PP, that's it.
 
Using a phone isn't the best excuse to avoid posting.... I play all WW games here on my mobile, and all my posts are from my mobile.. This is hardly an excuse..

And yeah, there are certainly elements of you that are scummy.. EM and camos interactions are what (in my eyes) make you truly scummy, but you yourself haven't provided much this game.

Camo will often attack his own scum partners. His interactions with EM are borderline buddying, defending and also attacking, something he does to his scum partners.

I've provided just as much as most other people, and more than you. The point was I'm usually out and about and don't have time to fully read everything and type out a thought-out post. Camo has gone after just about everyone at some point in the games he's been in. Weak evidence, especially with what we have on KX. You're bandwagoning and echoeing bb. @bbninjas do you think KX is scum?

Not sure about anyone else here, but I'm pretty confident KX is town. I've never played a game like this before, but I feel like he's worried because he has a role that seems very safeclaim-ish but isn't.

Why are you tagging Robin? Unless Robin asked the same thing and I missed it, I'm pretty sure my name reads PikaMasterJesi... (Went back and checked, and there's nothing from him/her on that.)

Robin was inquiring about a previous WW game I was in.

What if I flip town??

Then I'll look into everyone who pushed your lynch. I'll be suspect too ofc. I 100% think you are scum at this point
 
Thing is, EM was mainly posting excuses and Camo was defending him to an extent. It just so happens that you've subbed in for him, and that's why the people who have voted for you have done so. You're in the shoes of the one who's actually technically being suspected.
IIRC, Camo would never defend his scum buddy. He would go to an extend to lynch that but not defend. So that he does not get lynched when the one he defend flipped scum
 
(Just a quick sneak while at work)

Replies and quotes:

Well looks like my flip at the end of the day will be quite the shock. I would vote Celever to try to save myself, but he's probably town and it would only make me look worse.

Why are you suddenly intent on trying to save yourself? Earlier, you were very confident and said that your death wouldn't matter much because you're vanilla and used up your ability or something along those lines. This post has a casual/resigned tone, but the words themselves hint at inward panic.

Le sigh, I could prove my towniness by allowing me live until the next even numbered day (tomorrow) and I could pull up something that couldn't be easily faked from wiretapping.

This is another typical excuse that scum tend to use to stall for time. I initially was suspicious of you due to your role claim, but posts like these don't help reduce the suspicion in my eyes.

Furthermore, I doubt that could happen with the wiretapping/spying ability you have. Why? Because there is no third party counter-checking here. If you post something, there is no other player here that could say you're possibly lying. So, you could fabricate a QT quote and no one would be able to tell. Subsequently, it wouldn't ably 'confirm' your role claim/wiretapping ability.

I Noted the Bb being poisoned thing before.

I'm working on a theory that poisoning may be the night kill? Unless scum have two killing methods? That's bizarre!

Anyways gotta go to work now so I'll be back later

That's happened before, actually; on Werewolf XVII Universe as I recall reading on past games for role ideas when I hosted. And while that sounds like it could work in theory, bear in mind what simsands has pointed out earlier as well: Dogger's flip has revealed that he can make the nightkill fail, so if the poison was the nightkill, then his death would have to be from something else. And yet he was the first to reveal about being poisoned, way back Day 1. Well, you could factor in the complexities of possible ability blocking or boosting, but this is the simplest explanation.

Defending Empoleon Master? This is pretty out of character for Camo.


This is classic. In Harry Potter Camo made these posts about me all the time and we were teammates.



Defending him again.



"Probably". Camo is one for absolutes. This sounds more like he's actually warning EM. #buddyalert.

##vote:grantm1999

Interesting observation, but I could honestly see this as WIFOM also. It's comparable to the Camo vs Celever argument, which we've discussed can be staged or planned on their part. Considering that even in death Camo seems to be playing WIFOM with us in his posts that TGK has been sharing, I wouldn't put it past him.


For me though, I'm more convinced on the KX case, because it's not just his posts that have gotten my attention for being suspicious, but his role claim originally, so...

@Reinforce ; you may as well vote King X. Apart from nothing else productive likely going to happen, Celever is also tied with King X for lynch iirc, so putting King X in the lead would be helpful in case something dodgy happens.

I'm going to take this suggestion.

##GOTCHA: King Xerneas
 
Dead PMJ said:
185
pmj1234567890
siguser.png

05-12-2016
06:30 PM ET (US)
The quoted past game re grant's meta is useless, Camo tried lynching him because he read grant's lurk/inactive meta as town, not scum. If Camo had thought grant was scum based on that meta he wouldn't have suggested his lynch.

184
pmj1234567890
siguser.png

05-12-2016
06:12 PM ET (US)
Hey bbninjas, tgk is confirmed town, trying to discredit him after the fact means you are scum.

And I'm gone again.
 
Also, what's future referencey about that, huh? >:L
bb does the future reference thing all the time. In games you've definitely played in. Looks to me like you're fishing here.
No it's not. bb is hiding something. @bbninjas, don't hide stuff. Fine, if you weren't so lazy about your future reference posts I wouldn't have been able to call you out on it. You've made that mistake now, so you have to answer for it. In the other game all of your future reference posts were clear and apparently from a town's perspective. If I'd asked you why you tagged any of those posts, you would have been able to answer me. You have no reason not to be able to answer me unless you're scum and hiding something, so that's why my vote remains on you.
You come very close to rationalizing your fish, but no. It's obvious bb isn't hiding anything that you couldn't have found out for yourself; he's just marking a post because for whatever reason he doesn't like to keep a doc of stuff he's noticed.
This isn't a role fish. There's nothing to do with his role in the equation right now.
You very carefully deny that it's a role fish, but make no comment on it being fishing of a different sort.
bbninjas made about 30 future references in the other game in which he used the system. For that post to be one of them there must be good reasoning, and that is reasoning he should share with the town. I've never seen a role be affected by actual time frames before because obviously that wouldn't work with different time zones. The post's content can't be associated with a role. Future references were also exclusively made in conjunction with reads the last time bb used the technique.
And share his thoughts with the scum, too? Come on, Celever. Reads benefit the scum, too. Especially when they're unnecessary at the time you call for them.
Carson, you should also probably post your Role PM. Just as a reference for if you flip scum.
There's literally no difference besides flavour. If he has more abilities he would have the sense to cut them out of his Role PM. I'm assuming based on the OP that the vast majority of players only have one ability and their evidence to use anyway.
Camo called you out at the time for this being a soft backpedal, and now that I see it, it really bugs me. You didn't mention the flavor or the omission of abilities when you called for tgk to claim.
Damnit I can't tell a lie; I am scum!! :eek:
you claimed scum turbolynch gogogo
I'm probably gonna get called out for tunnelling again, but @bbninjas: rationalise your vote.
I believe it was you who said "I'm probably going to get called out for XXX" helps no one. Hypocritical, then?
IDRK. Camo has a fixation with attacking one or two players (me, Keeper, grant and WanderingWolf, who left the site :<) so I tend to just assume he'll do it every time and not look into it. I'm well aware that he only does it because we're relatively easy to push lynches on, anyway. It's not town play, but Camo does it as town (and as scum).
Camo's tunneling of you isn't anything out of the ordinary.
Honestly I have no interest in responding to the semantics of this case any more. This is completely stereotypical Camo's scum play and it's seriously toxic to the community. I know of a few people who don't play on this site because of it. My response won't elicit a change in the minds of the simsands or Camo, who have pulled out their tunnel vision goggles, and at this point there's enough content (or lack thereof) for the other players to draw their own conclusions, which we can see they already have.
But now it's his scum meta.
I'll keep my sources close to my chest I think. :p
Whoa whoa whoa. After all you went through Day 1 to get bb to reveal why he future-reference'd a random post? This is getting ridiculous.

Points for Celever:
  • He's scumhunting, I'll give him that. Although, Camo also manages to scumhunt while scum, so I'm not putting too much stock in this.
  • Frustration over lack of cases.
  • Camo pushing for his lynch late Day 1/early Day 2 or thereabouts. This seems really close to WIFOM to me, though.
Points against Celever:
  • Mild fishing.
  • Backpedalling.
  • Hypocrisy (or LaL, if you want to call it that).
  • Contradictions.
There's your case, Celever. Defend.
 
...
...
...
You know, I'm really not worried if scum are trying to shoot Maya now.
200.gif

bb does the future reference thing all the time. In games you've definitely played in. Looks to me like you're fishing here.

You come very close to rationalizing your fish, but no. It's obvious bb isn't hiding anything that you couldn't have found out for yourself; he's just marking a post because for whatever reason he doesn't like to keep a doc of stuff he's noticed.

You very carefully deny that it's a role fish, but make no comment on it being fishing of a different sort.

And share his thoughts with the scum, too? Come on, Celever. Reads benefit the scum, too. Especially when they're unnecessary at the time you call for them.
Are you saying there's another kind of fish? Like, a reads fish? Because I've never heard of this before. >_>
Camo called you out at the time for this being a soft backpedal, and now that I see it, it really bugs me. You didn't mention the flavor or the omission of abilities when you called for tgk to claim.
At the time, I assumed TGK was smart enough to change his Role PM where appropriate. I've talked earlier in this game about how town shouldn't have to riddle their posts with disclaimers.

Looking at his play during this game though, I think you're right about me having to spell things out from him in basic terms! n_n"
you claimed scum turbolynch gogogo

I believe it was you who said "I'm probably going to get called out for XXX" helps no one. Hypocritical, then?
Yeah it's fluff, I know. As is your above struck through comment. When the player isn't posting content, they want to omit as much fluff as they can, and that comment was directed to EM. You see the difference?
Camo's tunneling of you isn't anything out of the ordinary.

But now it's his scum meta.
I was using a double entendre. I was kinda mad at Camo's tunnelling yesterday, just like yours today. :p
Whoa whoa whoa. After all you went through Day 1 to get bb to reveal why he future-reference'd a random post? This is getting ridiculous.
At the time, I said why his future reference couldn't be to do with a role, whereas all clearing of town will be associated with a role. Therefore, there is a major difference. What Xerneas (IIRC) did was a role fish, whereas I apparently did a reads fish or some new made up term. :p
Points against Celever:
  • Mild fishing.
You're gonna need to clarify this whole "reads fishing" thing and explain why it's scummy. I mean, scum benefit from it, but it was early Day 1, which is where the gap between town's information level and scum's information level is the greatest. And bb wasn't even necessarily talking about a read, I was just wanting to know why he did what he did as I felt it was a good route of pressure to pursue early Day 1. Pressure leaves the pressurer appearing scummy 100% of the time, and unfortunately that's just the nature of the role. But some people have to take it up, and as far as I'm concerned, the rest of the game has to adjust their reads accordingly. Without the pressurers, we would be running into a wall with no leads right now. As far as I see it, pressurers beat down that wall so that the town slowly gets more vision and reads. The only difference in this game to normal is that all of the tunnellers are still constantly walking into that wall, but I'm on the other side, chiselling away and presenting other reads and leads. The tunnellers don't care though, and as I continue contributing, the tunnellers get closer and closer to lynching me.

Do you see why I am getting annoyed now?
  • Backpedalling.
I think I uh, missed where this is. Are you referring to where I assumed TGK would have the sense to omit private and classified information from his own role? Because if so, that's not really backpedalling so much as basic clarification. Maybe I made a mistake assuming he was smart enough to do that... but is that really grounds for a lynch?
  • Hypocrisy (or LaL, if you want to call it that).
Now you've lost me. Was the hypocrisy my double entendre? That's possible, but there is nothing to do with LaL in that situation, so that can't be it... What exactly are you referring to here? Oh wait, you were referring to the "I'll get called out for x" thing, because you surmised that it was hypocrisy during your description of the quote, right? Well, I guess I've already justified that whole fluff thing.
  • Contradictions.
Wait wait, is this the major reach you've derived from the double entendre instead? I think that contradictions would be a more logical reach than LaL, so maybe.

Your case has no content. Out of the ~200 or w/e posts (probably a lot more like 300 actually) I've made in this game, you found 11 posts in which you could find
major reaches to try and push my lynch on. Quit tunnelling.
~~~~~~~~~
I'm in so many minds about grant and KX rn, uhani. We're all currently tied with 4 votes, which is a really paranoid place to be in. @double o squirtle, @quakingpunch73, how many hours from whenever you answer this question is deadline? I'll be on as close to it as possible and be keeping up with the thread on my phone during the day. I may have to place a self-pres vote today, and I'm sure Xerneas and grant are prepared to do the same. Right now, I'm still more interested in a vote on Xerneas than grant, but I'll be interested in the defense he provides.
 
@GM DracLord, your reasoning for voting for me was because everyone else was and there weren't any alternatives. Well, now I'm tied with Xerneas and grant, and the latter is someone you've never talked about yet. Want to share thoughts before deadline?

Or maybe I should have phrased that better, since "want" implies you have a choice. :p It's fine if you vote for me, just justify it, please. Your one piece of reasoning has now been removed.
 
Partly speaking as a mod now, but please watch the flaming and insults everyone. It is fine to affront and question particular moves made by a player. But directly targeting the player is not okay in my book. And shouldn't be taking too far not in this game or anywhere else. Please keep this in mind.
 
So after reading that and post 92 also, I'm convinced that this is his meta for PR or scum. So town PR he is most likely not since if I understand the term it is Power Role but the meaning here would be a powerful role and not just the term Power Role, which in this site everyone are PR-aka not vanilla, right?
My understanding of PR is something that is particularly helpful for the town. Seer and doctor are obvious, as are roles like jailers/blockers, trackers/watchers and other things that can either stop scum's kill or find scum.

lol. this case is even worse than celever's. The only reason for pressuring me is some obscure interaction with EM, who I'm subbed in for.
The only reasoning on ME is lurking. I've been busy, I have only been able to check the thread every now and then on my phone since whenever the last time I posted was. I don't bother posting on my phone because it's annoying and I can't go back and look at things etc. They wouldn't be good posts at all. The wagon is so stupid. bb makes some weak case and the others who have voted me are simply bandwagoning and ofc KX wants to save his own skin.
I love how you decide to vote me purely for lurking when like half the players do that. Drac robin reinforce skyleaf etc.
But you said before that there were other reasons. You also ignored the reason of "read grant's posts and you'll find that they're generally a sitting on the edge or observing the scumhunt from the outside". This is probably the more important piece of evidence on you - I certainly won't build a case solely from lurking unless I was completely stuck.

Also says my posts were scummy and not helpful or whatever, with zero examples.
I did not say that (being "not helpful"). I think your posts are odd. They aren't sitting well with me. They have this contributing feel to it, but as I said, it feels like you're more watching and letting it happen.

@bbninjas do you think KX is scum?
I think it's possible. While I think you're a better lynch atm, I do feel a lot like either you or King X is scum. Especially because of how votes have been going. Something's weird with these votes. We had half on Celever, and half on King X. Then we had roughly an equal amount on all three options. This rarely happens - everyone either stays or shifts, but rarely enough to make a tie. I think this could indicate a reluctant scumteam somewhere.
 
Also, @PMJ , that QT post I brought up has relevance. grant was scum and lurked. That's the point.

Also okay at that second post. Fortunately for you, I'm expecting to be flipping soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top